Radxa Rock vs PandaBoard

Struggling to choose between Radxa Rock and PandaBoard? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Radxa Rock is a System & Hardware solution with tags like arm, rockchip, rk3328, quadcore, cortexa53, embedded-computing.

It boasts features such as Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, Mali-450 MP2 GPU, 1GB or 2GB DDR3 RAM, 8GB or 16GB eMMC flash storage, Gigabit Ethernet, 40-pin GPIO header, MIPI DSI and CSI interfaces and pros including Low cost, Good performance for the price, Community support, Wide range of I/O options.

On the other hand, PandaBoard is a System & Hardware product tagged with arm, omap4430, android, ubuntu, linux.

Its standout features include Low-cost open-source single-board computer, Based on OMAP4430 system-on-a-chip, Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, 1GB RAM, Runs Android, Ubuntu and other Linux distributions, and it shines with pros like Inexpensive, Open source design allows customization, Supports various operating systems.

Feature	Radxa Rock	PandaBoard
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	System & Hardware

Product Overview

Radxa Rock

Description: Radxa Rock is a small, low-cost single-board computer that runs on a Rockchip RK3328 quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor. It is designed for high performance embedded computing projects.

PandaBoard

Description: PandaBoard is an low-cost, open-source single-board computer based on the OMAP4430 system-on-a-chip. It features a dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, 1GB of RAM, and runs Android, Ubuntu, and other Linux distributions.

Key Features Comparison

Radxa Rock Features

• Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor
• Mali-450 MP2 GPU
• 1GB or 2GB DDR3 RAM
• 8GB or 16GB eMMC flash storage
• Gigabit Ethernet
• 40-pin GPIO header
• MIPI DSI and CSI interfaces

PandaBoard Features

• Low-cost open-source single-board computer
• Based on OMAP4430 system-on-a-chip
• Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 CPU
• 1GB RAM
• Runs Android, Ubuntu and other Linux distributions

Pros & Cons Analysis

Radxa Rock

Pros

• Low cost
• Good performance for the price
• Community support
• Wide range of I/O options

Cons

• Limited RAM and storage options
• No built-in wireless connectivity
• Lacks some features found on more expensive boards

PandaBoard

Pros

• Inexpensive
• Open source design allows customization
• Supports various operating systems

Cons

• Limited processing power compared to newer boards
• May require technical expertise to set up and configure

Pricing Comparison

Radxa Rock

• One-time Purchase

PandaBoard

• Open Source