Run on Earth vs ASICS Runkeeper

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Run on Earth icon
Run on Earth
ASICS Runkeeper icon
ASICS Runkeeper

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Run on Earth and ASICS Runkeeper? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Run on Earth is a Sport & Health solution with tags like running, walking, hiking, gps-tracking, pace-tracking, elevation-tracking.

It boasts features such as GPS tracking, Route mapping, Pace and distance tracking, Elevation tracking, Satellite imagery, Real-time stats and pros including Accurate GPS tracking, Maps your entire route, Tracks advanced running metrics, Works offline, Good for hiking and walking too.

On the other hand, ASICS Runkeeper is a Sport & Health product tagged with running, walking, cycling, gps-tracking, stats-tracking.

Its standout features include GPS tracking of runs, walks, bike rides, Set goals and track progress, Audio feedback during workouts, Share and compare workout data with friends, Integrates with music streaming services, Syncs data with wearables like Apple Watch and Fitbit, Interval training plans, Weather reports, Calorie and nutrition tracking, Training logs and history, and it shines with pros like Free to use with basic features, User friendly and easy to navigate, Accurate GPS and tracking, Social features to share and compete, Supports interval and custom workouts, Integrates with other fitness apps and devices, Audio coaching is helpful during runs, Detailed stats and progress reports.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Run on Earth and ASICS Runkeeper?

When evaluating Run on Earth versus ASICS Runkeeper, both solutions serve different needs within the sport & health ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Run on Earth and ASICS Runkeeper have established themselves in the sport & health market. Key areas include running, walking, hiking.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Run on Earth and ASICS Runkeeper significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include running, walking, hiking, gps-tracking.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include running, walking and running, walking.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Run on Earth and ASICS Runkeeper. You might also explore running, walking, hiking for alternative approaches.

Feature Run on Earth ASICS Runkeeper
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Sport & Health Sport & Health
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Run on Earth
Run on Earth

Description: Run on Earth is a fitness tracking app that uses satellite imagery to map your outdoor runs, walks, and hikes. It tracks your route, pace, distance, and elevation in real time.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

ASICS Runkeeper
ASICS Runkeeper

Description: ASICS Runkeeper is a popular fitness tracking app that allows users to track runs, walks, bike rides and more. It uses GPS to track stats like duration, distance, pace, route and calories burned. The app is free and works on iOS and Android.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Run on Earth
Run on Earth Features
  • GPS tracking
  • Route mapping
  • Pace and distance tracking
  • Elevation tracking
  • Satellite imagery
  • Real-time stats
ASICS Runkeeper
ASICS Runkeeper Features
  • GPS tracking of runs, walks, bike rides
  • Set goals and track progress
  • Audio feedback during workouts
  • Share and compare workout data with friends
  • Integrates with music streaming services
  • Syncs data with wearables like Apple Watch and Fitbit
  • Interval training plans
  • Weather reports
  • Calorie and nutrition tracking
  • Training logs and history

Pros & Cons Analysis

Run on Earth
Run on Earth
Pros
  • Accurate GPS tracking
  • Maps your entire route
  • Tracks advanced running metrics
  • Works offline
  • Good for hiking and walking too
Cons
  • Requires a phone with GPS
  • Satellite imagery drains battery
  • No training plans or workouts
  • Subscription required for full features
ASICS Runkeeper
ASICS Runkeeper
Pros
  • Free to use with basic features
  • User friendly and easy to navigate
  • Accurate GPS and tracking
  • Social features to share and compete
  • Supports interval and custom workouts
  • Integrates with other fitness apps and devices
  • Audio coaching is helpful during runs
  • Detailed stats and progress reports
Cons
  • Battery drain from constant GPS use
  • Subscription needed for full features
  • Occasional bugs and crashes
  • Limited customization options
  • Data privacy concerns
  • Can be inaccurate in cities or with poor GPS
  • No offline use
  • App can be slow at times

Pricing Comparison

Run on Earth
Run on Earth
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based
ASICS Runkeeper
ASICS Runkeeper
  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs