Screwdriver vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between Screwdriver and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Screwdriver is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, deployment, delivery, cicd.

It boasts features such as Continuous integration and delivery, Pipeline configuration as code, Built-in Docker container management, Dashboard for monitoring builds and deployments, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc., Role-based access control, Scalable infrastructure and pros including Open source and free to use, Lightweight and easy to set up, Supports many languages and frameworks, Good for small teams getting started with CI/CD, Active community support.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	Screwdriver	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Screwdriver

Description: Screwdriver is a lightweight open source continuous delivery and release automation platform. It helps developers easily build, test, and deploy their code and facilitates faster and simpler delivery of apps and services.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

Screwdriver Features

• Continuous integration and delivery
• Pipeline configuration as code
• Built-in Docker container management
• Dashboard for monitoring builds and deployments
• Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.
• Role-based access control
• Scalable infrastructure

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Screwdriver

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Lightweight and easy to set up
• Supports many languages and frameworks
• Good for small teams getting started with CI/CD
• Active community support

Cons

• Limited features compared to enterprise CI/CD tools
• Steep learning curve for YAML pipeline syntax
• Not ideal for large, complex deployments
• Lacks advanced reporting and analytics

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Screwdriver

• Open Source
• Free

Earthly

• Open Source