Siege vs locust

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Siege icon
Siege
locust icon
locust

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Siege and locust? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Siege is a Development solution with tags like load-testing, benchmarking, web-application.

It boasts features such as Load testing, Stress testing, Benchmarking, HTTP/HTTPS protocol support, Authentication support, Concurrent virtual users, Customizable test scenarios, Command line interface, Detailed performance metrics and pros including Open source, Lightweight and easy to use, Cross-platform, Highly customizable, Can simulate thousands of concurrent users, Good for testing app scalability.

On the other hand, locust is a Development product tagged with load-testing, performance-testing, web-application-testing.

Its standout features include Distributed load testing, Scripting using Python, Simulate thousands of concurrent users, Web-based UI, CSV results output, Can test any system that has a HTTP interface, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy to use, Scalable, Good documentation, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Siege and locust?

When evaluating Siege versus locust, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Siege and locust have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include load-testing, benchmarking, web-application.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Siege and locust significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include load-testing, benchmarking, web-application.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include load-testing, benchmarking and load-testing, performance-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Siege and locust. You might also explore load-testing, benchmarking, web-application for alternative approaches.

Feature Siege locust
Overall Score 1 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Siege
Siege

Description: Siege is an open source load testing and benchmarking utility for web applications. It allows developers to put load on a web server to test application stability and performance under heavy load.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

locust
locust

Description: Locust is an open source load and performance testing tool written in Python. It allows developers to test the performance of their web applications by simulating large numbers of concurrent users making requests.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Siege
Siege Features
  • Load testing
  • Stress testing
  • Benchmarking
  • HTTP/HTTPS protocol support
  • Authentication support
  • Concurrent virtual users
  • Customizable test scenarios
  • Command line interface
  • Detailed performance metrics
locust
locust Features
  • Distributed load testing
  • Scripting using Python
  • Simulate thousands of concurrent users
  • Web-based UI
  • CSV results output
  • Can test any system that has a HTTP interface

Pros & Cons Analysis

Siege
Siege
Pros
  • Open source
  • Lightweight and easy to use
  • Cross-platform
  • Highly customizable
  • Can simulate thousands of concurrent users
  • Good for testing app scalability
Cons
  • Limited reporting compared to commercial tools
  • Steep learning curve
  • Only supports web apps, not other services
  • No GUI
  • Can underestimate large-scale production loads
locust
locust
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy to use
  • Scalable
  • Good documentation
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Only supports HTTP protocol
  • Limited reporting capabilities
  • Steep learning curve for advanced usage

Pricing Comparison

Siege
Siege
  • Open Source
locust
locust
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs