SockJS vs Faye

Struggling to choose between SockJS and Faye? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

SockJS is a Development solution with tags like websocket, realtime, communication.

It boasts features such as WebSocket emulation - Provides a WebSocket-like object in the browser, Transparent fallback - Automatically falls back to other transports like HTTP long-polling if WebSockets are not available, Cross-browser - Works across all major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc, Multiple transports - Supports WebSocket, HTTP streaming, HTTP long-polling, etc, Heartbeats - Sends heartbeat messages to detect broken connections, Session multiplexing - Allows sharing a connection for multiple sessions and pros including Easy to use API, Good cross-browser support, Transparent fallback provides reliability, Actively maintained and updated.

On the other hand, Faye is a Online Services product tagged with realtime, websockets, publishsubscribe, notifications.

Its standout features include Real-time pub/sub messaging, Bidirectional communication via WebSockets, Client libraries for Ruby, Node.js, JavaScript and more, Message filtering based on channels, Extensible and pluggable architecture, Horizontal scalability with message load balancing, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Great for real-time web apps, Easy to integrate with Ruby on Rails apps, More scalable than alternatives like RabbitMQ, Open source and free to use.

Feature	SockJS	Faye
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Online Services

Product Overview

SockJS

Description: SockJS is a JavaScript library that provides a WebSocket-like object in the browser. It automatically falls back to other transports like HTTP long-polling if WebSockets are not available.

Faye

Description: Faye is an open-source web messaging and notification system based on the publish-subscribe pattern. It allows real-time communication between a server and clients using bidirectional connections over websockets.

Key Features Comparison

SockJS Features

• WebSocket emulation - Provides a WebSocket-like object in the browser
• Transparent fallback - Automatically falls back to other transports like HTTP long-polling if WebSockets are not available
• Cross-browser - Works across all major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc
• Multiple transports - Supports WebSocket, HTTP streaming, HTTP long-polling, etc
• Heartbeats - Sends heartbeat messages to detect broken connections
• Session multiplexing - Allows sharing a connection for multiple sessions

Faye Features

• Real-time pub/sub messaging
• Bidirectional communication via WebSockets
• Client libraries for Ruby, Node.js, JavaScript and more
• Message filtering based on channels
• Extensible and pluggable architecture
• Horizontal scalability with message load balancing

Pros & Cons Analysis

SockJS

Pros

• Easy to use API
• Good cross-browser support
• Transparent fallback provides reliability
• Actively maintained and updated

Cons

• Can add complexity when not needed
• Additional dependency
• May have lower performance than raw WebSockets

Faye

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Great for real-time web apps
• Easy to integrate with Ruby on Rails apps
• More scalable than alternatives like RabbitMQ
• Open source and free to use

Cons

• Limited documentation and community support
• Not ideal for extremely high throughput
• Requires Faye server to be always online

Pricing Comparison

SockJS

• Open Source

Faye

• Open Source