Spectre.css vs Bulma

Struggling to choose between Spectre.css and Bulma? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Spectre.css is a Development solution with tags like css, framework, responsive, lightweight, prototyping.

It boasts features such as Lightweight and minimal CSS framework, Fully responsive design, Flexbox-based, mobile-first fluid grid, Easily customizable with Sass variables and mixins, Styling for basic UI elements like buttons, forms, tables, etc, Extensive documentation and examples and pros including Very lightweight at only ~10KB gzipped, Flexbox-based grid provides flexibility, Mobile-first approach for responsive sites, Easier and faster development with UI elements, Customizable with Sass for advanced users, Good documentation.

On the other hand, Bulma is a Development product tagged with css, frontend, flexbox, responsive, web-design.

Its standout features include Modular design, Mobile-first approach, Flexbox-based responsive layout, SASS source files, Customizable with CSS variables, Lightweight and fast, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn and use, Good documentation, Open source and free, Small file size, Flexibility and customizability, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Spectre.css

Spectre.css

Spectre.css is a lightweight, responsive and modern CSS framework for faster and extensible development. It has intuitive classes for rapid prototyping and building web interfaces.

Categories:
css framework responsive lightweight prototyping

Spectre.css Features

  1. Lightweight and minimal CSS framework
  2. Fully responsive design
  3. Flexbox-based, mobile-first fluid grid
  4. Easily customizable with Sass variables and mixins
  5. Styling for basic UI elements like buttons, forms, tables, etc
  6. Extensive documentation and examples

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Very lightweight at only ~10KB gzipped

Flexbox-based grid provides flexibility

Mobile-first approach for responsive sites

Easier and faster development with UI elements

Customizable with Sass for advanced users

Good documentation

Cons

Less components than larger frameworks

Less browser support than frameworks like Bootstrap

Requires Sass pre-processor for customization

Smaller community than more popular options


Bulma

Bulma

Bulma is an open source CSS framework that provides ready-to-use frontend components that you can easily combine to build responsive web interfaces. Its design is based on Flexbox and it aims to provide an alternative to Bootstrap.

Categories:
css frontend flexbox responsive web-design

Bulma Features

  1. Modular design
  2. Mobile-first approach
  3. Flexbox-based responsive layout
  4. SASS source files
  5. Customizable with CSS variables
  6. Lightweight and fast

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Easy to learn and use

Good documentation

Open source and free

Small file size

Flexibility and customizability

Active community support

Cons

Less components than Bootstrap

Less browser support than Bootstrap

Less customization options out of the box

Less themes and templates available