Spokes vs localhost.run

Struggling to choose between Spokes and localhost.run? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Spokes is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like kanban, task-management, open-source.

It boasts features such as Kanban boards, Powerful search and filtering, GitHub integration, Jira integration, Custom fields, Keyboard shortcuts, Markdown support and pros including Free and open source, Great for agile/scrum workflows, Highly customizable, Integrates with other tools, Active development community.

On the other hand, localhost.run is a Development product tagged with localhost, development-environment, sandbox.

Its standout features include Browser-based development environments, Preconfigured sandboxes for various languages and frameworks, Collaboration features like shareable URLs and multiplayer mode, Integrated terminal and file explorer, Snapshots to save state of environments, GitHub/GitLab integration, and it shines with pros like No need to install languages/tools locally, Disposable environments, Fast setup, Accessible from any device, Collaboration capabilities, GitHub integration.

Feature	Spokes	localhost.run
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Office & Productivity	Development

Product Overview

Spokes

Description: Spokes is an open-source alternative to Trello for task and project management. It provides kanban boards to visualize work, powerful search and filtering, and integrations with GitHub, Jira, and more.

localhost.run

Description: localhost.run is a platform that allows you to easily spin up local development environments inside your browser. It eliminates the need to install software locally by providing disposable, ready-to-code sandboxes for various languages and frameworks.

Key Features Comparison

Spokes Features

• Kanban boards
• Powerful search and filtering
• GitHub integration
• Jira integration
• Custom fields
• Keyboard shortcuts
• Markdown support

localhost.run Features

• Browser-based development environments
• Preconfigured sandboxes for various languages and frameworks
• Collaboration features like shareable URLs and multiplayer mode
• Integrated terminal and file explorer
• Snapshots to save state of environments
• GitHub/GitLab integration

Pros & Cons Analysis

Spokes

Pros

• Free and open source
• Great for agile/scrum workflows
• Highly customizable
• Integrates with other tools
• Active development community

Cons

• Less features than paid options like Trello
• Steeper learning curve than Trello
• Mobile apps need work
• Limited reporting capabilities

localhost.run

Pros

• No need to install languages/tools locally
• Disposable environments
• Fast setup
• Accessible from any device
• Collaboration capabilities
• GitHub integration

Cons

• Limited to web-based languages/frameworks
• Performance dependent on browser/internet speed
• Features may be limited compared to local setup
• Requires internet connection

Pricing Comparison

Spokes

• Open Source
• Free

localhost.run

• Freemium