Tarantool vs Redis

Struggling to choose between Tarantool and Redis? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Tarantool is a Development solution with tags like nosql, inmemory, lua, application-server.

It boasts features such as In-memory database for fast performance, Supports SQL and NoSQL data models, Built-in Lua application server, Connectors for integration with external databases/services, ACID transactions, Replication and sharding for scalability and pros including Very fast for real-time apps due to in-memory storage, Flexible data modeling with SQL and NoSQL, Lua server allows stored procedures and app logic, Horizontal scalability, Mature and production-ready.

On the other hand, Redis is a Development product tagged with caching, inmemory, keyvalue-store.

Its standout features include In-memory data structure store, Supports various data structures (strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, streams), Used as a database, cache, and message broker, Provides high performance and low latency, Supports replication, clustering, and high availability, Supports a wide range of programming languages, Provides a rich set of commands and APIs, Supports data persistence (RDB and AOF), and it shines with pros like High performance and low latency, Flexible and versatile data structures, Supports a wide range of use cases, Easy to set up and configure, Scalable and highly available, Open-source and free to use.

Feature	Tarantool	Redis
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Tarantool

Description: Tarantool is an open-source NoSQL database and application server. It combines an in-memory database for real-time performance, Lua application server for stored procedures and task scheduling, and connectors to integrate with external databases and services.

Redis

Description: Redis is an open-source, in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache and message broker. It supports data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes and streams.

Key Features Comparison

Tarantool Features

• In-memory database for fast performance
• Supports SQL and NoSQL data models
• Built-in Lua application server
• Connectors for integration with external databases/services
• ACID transactions
• Replication and sharding for scalability

Redis Features

• In-memory data structure store
• Supports various data structures (strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, streams)
• Used as a database, cache, and message broker
• Provides high performance and low latency
• Supports replication, clustering, and high availability
• Supports a wide range of programming languages
• Provides a rich set of commands and APIs
• Supports data persistence (RDB and AOF)

Pros & Cons Analysis

Tarantool

Pros

• Very fast for real-time apps due to in-memory storage
• Flexible data modeling with SQL and NoSQL
• Lua server allows stored procedures and app logic
• Horizontal scalability
• Mature and production-ready

Cons

• Less flexible than pure in-memory databases
• Lua programming language has a learning curve
• Not as popular as some other NoSQL databases

Redis

Pros

• High performance and low latency
• Flexible and versatile data structures
• Supports a wide range of use cases
• Easy to set up and configure
• Scalable and highly available
• Open-source and free to use

Cons

• In-memory nature can lead to data loss in case of system failures
• Complexity in setting up and maintaining a highly available Redis cluster
• Limited support for transactions and complex queries compared to traditional databases
• Potential for high memory usage, especially for large datasets

Pricing Comparison

Tarantool

• Open Source
• Custom Pricing

Redis

• Open Source