TruFont vs Microsoft Font Validator

Struggling to choose between TruFont and Microsoft Font Validator? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

TruFont is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like font-editor, truetype, opentype, glyphs, kerning, metrics, typography.

It boasts features such as Drawing tools for designing glyphs, Kerning and metrics editing, Support for TrueType and OpenType fonts, Python scripting interface, Unicode character set support, Glyph substitution and positioning, Font hinting capabilities, Export to common font formats and pros including Free and open source, Cross-platform availability, Powerful typographic features, Customizable and extensible via Python scripts, Active development community.

On the other hand, Microsoft Font Validator is a Office & Productivity product tagged with font, validator, testing, quality-assurance, microsoft.

Its standout features include Scans font files for issues like missing glyphs, corrupt data, and format inconsistencies, Provides detailed reports on font file problems, Supports various font formats including TrueType, OpenType, and WOFF, Allows users to test font files before using them in projects, Helps designers and developers ensure font quality and consistency, and it shines with pros like Free to use, Comprehensive font file validation, Supports a wide range of font formats, Easy to use interface, Helps identify and fix font-related issues early in the development process.

Feature	TruFont	Microsoft Font Validator
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Photos & Graphics	Office & Productivity

Product Overview

TruFont

Description: TruFont is an open-source font editor for Linux, Windows and macOS that allows users to create and edit TrueType and OpenType fonts. It has tools for drawing glyphs, kerning, metrics and inserting advanced typographic features.

Microsoft Font Validator

Description: Microsoft Font Validator is a free tool that allows designers and developers to test font files for issues before using them in projects. It scans fonts for problems like missing glyphs, corrupt data, and format inconsistencies.

Key Features Comparison

TruFont Features

• Drawing tools for designing glyphs
• Kerning and metrics editing
• Support for TrueType and OpenType fonts
• Python scripting interface
• Unicode character set support
• Glyph substitution and positioning
• Font hinting capabilities
• Export to common font formats

Microsoft Font Validator Features

• Scans font files for issues like missing glyphs, corrupt data, and format inconsistencies
• Provides detailed reports on font file problems
• Supports various font formats including TrueType, OpenType, and WOFF
• Allows users to test font files before using them in projects
• Helps designers and developers ensure font quality and consistency

Pros & Cons Analysis

TruFont

Pros

• Free and open source
• Cross-platform availability
• Powerful typographic features
• Customizable and extensible via Python scripts
• Active development community

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited documentation
• Not as full-featured as some commercial font editors

Microsoft Font Validator

Pros

• Free to use
• Comprehensive font file validation
• Supports a wide range of font formats
• Easy to use interface
• Helps identify and fix font-related issues early in the development process

Cons

• Limited to font file validation only, no other font management features
• May not cover all possible font-related issues
• No advanced features or customization options

Pricing Comparison

TruFont

• Open Source

Microsoft Font Validator

• Free