VirtEngine vs WebVirtMgr

Struggling to choose between VirtEngine and WebVirtMgr? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

VirtEngine is a System & Hardware solution with tags like virtualization, containers, opensource.

It boasts features such as Web-based interface for managing VMs, containers and Kubernetes clusters, Support for major hypervisors like KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, Built-in container orchestration with Docker and Kubernetes, Multi-cloud support for provisioning across different cloud providers, REST API for automation and integration, Role-based access control and quotas for teams, High availability with redundant components, Live migration of VMs between hosts, Monitoring and alerting for VMs and containers and pros including Open source and free to use, Intuitive web UI for fast setup and management, Multi-hypervisor and multi-cloud support, Kubernetes integration for container orchestration, Active community support and development.

On the other hand, WebVirtMgr is a Network & Admin product tagged with virtualization, web-interface, libvirt, open-source.

Its standout features include Web-based interface to manage virtual machines and hosts, Supports KVM and Xen hypervisors, VM console access through VNC or SPICE, VM creation, deletion, starting, stopping, Live migration of VMs between hosts, Storage pool and volume management, Network management, User and permission management, and it shines with pros like Easy to use graphical interface, Accessible from anywhere through a web browser, Open source and free, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

VirtEngine

VirtEngine

VirtEngine is an open-source platform for managing virtual machines and containers. It provides a web-based interface for provisioning, monitoring, and orchestrating VMs, containers, and Kubernetes clusters across private and public clouds.

Categories:
virtualization containers opensource

VirtEngine Features

  1. Web-based interface for managing VMs, containers and Kubernetes clusters
  2. Support for major hypervisors like KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi
  3. Built-in container orchestration with Docker and Kubernetes
  4. Multi-cloud support for provisioning across different cloud providers
  5. REST API for automation and integration
  6. Role-based access control and quotas for teams
  7. High availability with redundant components
  8. Live migration of VMs between hosts
  9. Monitoring and alerting for VMs and containers

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Open source and free to use

Intuitive web UI for fast setup and management

Multi-hypervisor and multi-cloud support

Kubernetes integration for container orchestration

Active community support and development

Cons

Steeper learning curve than standalone solutions

Requires more resources to run compared to basic hypervisors

Not as feature rich as paid solutions like vSphere

Limited support options compared to commercial products


WebVirtMgr

WebVirtMgr

WebVirtMgr is an open-source web interface for managing virtual machines using libvirt. It allows you to connect to libvirt on remote hosts and manage domains, networks, storage pools and more through a web browser.

Categories:
virtualization web-interface libvirt open-source

WebVirtMgr Features

  1. Web-based interface to manage virtual machines and hosts
  2. Supports KVM and Xen hypervisors
  3. VM console access through VNC or SPICE
  4. VM creation, deletion, starting, stopping
  5. Live migration of VMs between hosts
  6. Storage pool and volume management
  7. Network management
  8. User and permission management

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Easy to use graphical interface

Accessible from anywhere through a web browser

Open source and free

Active development community

Cons

Limited features compared to VirtManager desktop app

Can be complex to set up and configure

Not as performant as native virt tools

Web interface can feel sluggish at times