Working Copy vs CubeGit

Struggling to choose between Working Copy and CubeGit? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Working Copy is a Development solution with tags like git, github, version-control, ios.

It boasts features such as Local Git repository management, Remote repository syncing, Commit, push, pull support, Repository browsing, Branch management, Merge conflict resolution, File editing and diff viewing and pros including Full-featured Git client, Works offline, Integrates with various Git hosting services, Easy to use interface, Powerful editor for code changes.

On the other hand, CubeGit is a Development product tagged with git, metrics, analytics, governance.

Its standout features include Advanced metrics and analytics, Governance capabilities, Built-in support for GitLab issues, merge requests and repositories, and it shines with pros like More visibility into development processes, Better oversight over repositories, More control over GitLab instance.

Feature	Working Copy	CubeGit
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Working Copy

Description: Working Copy is a Git client for iOS that allows you to manage Git repositories locally on your device or remote repositories on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and more. It has features like commit, push, pull, repository browsing, and more.

CubeGit

Description: CubeGit is a GitLab fork focused on providing advanced metrics, analytics and governance features for GitLab. It adds built-in support for GitLab issues, merge requests and repositories.

Key Features Comparison

Working Copy Features

• Local Git repository management
• Remote repository syncing
• Commit, push, pull support
• Repository browsing
• Branch management
• Merge conflict resolution
• File editing and diff viewing

CubeGit Features

• Advanced metrics and analytics
• Governance capabilities
• Built-in support for GitLab issues, merge requests and repositories

Pros & Cons Analysis

Working Copy

Pros

• Full-featured Git client
• Works offline
• Integrates with various Git hosting services
• Easy to use interface
• Powerful editor for code changes

Cons

• iOS only
• Limited to mobile device constraints
• Requires some Git knowledge
• iOS file system makes some operations slower

CubeGit

Pros

• More visibility into development processes
• Better oversight over repositories
• More control over GitLab instance

Cons

• Additional complexity on top of GitLab
• Requires more configuration and maintenance
• Less community support than main GitLab project

Pricing Comparison

Working Copy

• Free
• Subscription-Based

CubeGit

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based