wpull vs grab-site

Struggling to choose between wpull and grab-site? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

wpull is a Network & Admin solution with tags like downloader, crawler, website, automation.

It boasts features such as Recursively downloads entire websites, Supports HTTP, HTTPS and FTP protocols, Resumes broken downloads, Saves files in WARC format, Customizable via Python scripts, Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows and macOS and pros including Free and open source, Powerful crawling and scraping capabilities, Good for archiving websites, Extendable and customizable, Actively maintained.

On the other hand, grab-site is a Web Browsers product tagged with website-copier, website-downloader, offline-browsing, archiving.

Its standout features include Download entire websites for offline browsing, Save websites as local HTML files, Download images, CSS, JavaScript, and other assets, Supports recursive downloading of linked pages, Customizable download options (e.g., depth, file types), Ability to exclude certain files or directories from the download, Multithreaded downloading for faster site mirroring, Supports various URL schemes (HTTP, HTTPS, FTP), and it shines with pros like Convenient way to archive websites for offline access, Preserves the original website structure and layout, Useful for developers, researchers, and content creators, Free and open-source software, Actively maintained and updated.

Feature	wpull	grab-site
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Web Browsers

Product Overview

wpull

Description: wpull is an open-source website downloader and crawler for Linux, Windows, and macOS. It can recursively download entire websites and handle various web formats. wpull is scriptable and customizable to automate large downloads.

grab-site

Description: Grab-site is a website copier and downloader tool that allows you to easily copy entire websites locally for offline browsing or archiving purposes. It can download a site's HTML, images, CSS, JS, and other assets.

Key Features Comparison

wpull Features

• Recursively downloads entire websites
• Supports HTTP, HTTPS and FTP protocols
• Resumes broken downloads
• Saves files in WARC format
• Customizable via Python scripts
• Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows and macOS

grab-site Features

• Download entire websites for offline browsing
• Save websites as local HTML files
• Download images, CSS, JavaScript, and other assets
• Supports recursive downloading of linked pages
• Customizable download options (e.g., depth, file types)
• Ability to exclude certain files or directories from the download
• Multithreaded downloading for faster site mirroring
• Supports various URL schemes (HTTP, HTTPS, FTP)

Pros & Cons Analysis

wpull

Pros

• Free and open source
• Powerful crawling and scraping capabilities
• Good for archiving websites
• Extendable and customizable
• Actively maintained

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Requires coding skills for advanced usage
• No GUI
• Less user friendly than browser extensions
• Lacks some features of commercial download managers

grab-site

Pros

• Convenient way to archive websites for offline access
• Preserves the original website structure and layout
• Useful for developers, researchers, and content creators
• Free and open-source software
• Actively maintained and updated

Cons

• May violate website terms of service if used excessively
• Downloading large websites can be time-consuming
• Limited support for dynamic content and JavaScript-heavy sites
• Potential legal issues with downloading copyrighted material

Pricing Comparison

wpull

• Open Source

grab-site

• Open Source