Xarchiver vs PeaZip

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Xarchiver icon
Xarchiver
PeaZip icon
PeaZip

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Xarchiver and PeaZip? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Xarchiver is a File Management solution with tags like archiver, extractor, compressor, file-management, open-source.

It boasts features such as Graphical user interface for archive management, Support for many popular archive formats like 7z, zip, rar, iso, etc, Create, extract, add, delete, test and view archive files, Integration with file managers for easy access, Lightweight and fast and pros including Easy to use interface, Good format support, Integrates well with Linux desktops, Fast and lightweight.

On the other hand, PeaZip is a File Management product tagged with compression, encryption, open-source.

Its standout features include Supports many archive formats (7Z, ARC, Brotli, BZ2, GZ, PAQ, PEA, QUAD/BALZ, TAR, ZIP, ZSTD, LZMA, XZ, etc.), File manager functionality, File encryption, Secure password manager, Two factor authentication, Lightweight and portable, Plugin architecture, Cross platform (Windows, Linux, macOS), and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Good compression ratios, Intuitive interface, Strong security features, Lightweight and fast, Supports many formats, Cross platform compatibility.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Xarchiver and PeaZip?

When evaluating Xarchiver versus PeaZip, both solutions serve different needs within the file management ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Xarchiver and PeaZip have established themselves in the file management market. Key areas include archiver, extractor, compressor.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Xarchiver and PeaZip significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include archiver, extractor, compressor, file-management.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include archiver, extractor and compression, encryption.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Xarchiver and PeaZip. You might also explore archiver, extractor, compressor for alternative approaches.

Feature Xarchiver PeaZip
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category File Management File Management
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Xarchiver
Xarchiver

Description: Xarchiver is a lightweight open source file archiver and extractor for Linux. It supports many popular archive formats and allows users to easily compress and extract files and folders with a simple graphical interface.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

PeaZip
PeaZip

Description: PeaZip is a free and open source file archiver and file manager for Windows, Linux, and macOS. It supports a wide variety of compression formats, has a simple user interface, and includes security features like file encryption and two factor authentication.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Xarchiver
Xarchiver Features
  • Graphical user interface for archive management
  • Support for many popular archive formats like 7z, zip, rar, iso, etc
  • Create, extract, add, delete, test and view archive files
  • Integration with file managers for easy access
  • Lightweight and fast
PeaZip
PeaZip Features
  • Supports many archive formats (7Z, ARC, Brotli, BZ2, GZ, PAQ, PEA, QUAD/BALZ, TAR, ZIP, ZSTD, LZMA, XZ, etc.)
  • File manager functionality
  • File encryption
  • Secure password manager
  • Two factor authentication
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Plugin architecture
  • Cross platform (Windows, Linux, macOS)

Pros & Cons Analysis

Xarchiver
Xarchiver
Pros
  • Easy to use interface
  • Good format support
  • Integrates well with Linux desktops
  • Fast and lightweight
Cons
  • Lacks some advanced features like encryption
  • CLI version not available
  • Development seems stagnant
PeaZip
PeaZip
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Good compression ratios
  • Intuitive interface
  • Strong security features
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports many formats
  • Cross platform compatibility
Cons
  • Less popular than competitors like 7-Zip
  • Slower than some alternatives
  • Encryption can be complicated for beginners
  • Some stability issues reported
  • Limited cloud integration features

Pricing Comparison

Xarchiver
Xarchiver
  • Open Source
  • Free
PeaZip
PeaZip
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs