Zammad vs Request Tracker

Struggling to choose between Zammad and Request Tracker? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Zammad is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like helpdesk, ticketing, knowledge-base, customer-portal.

It boasts features such as Ticketing system for managing customer support requests, Knowledge base for self-service help, Customer portal for account management, SLA and escalation management, Reporting and analytics, Email piping and POP3/IMAP import, REST API and webhooks, Multi-channel support (email, social media, chat, etc), Customizable workflows, Role-based access control, Multi-language support, Integration with LDAP, SAML, CalDAV and pros including Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Intuitive and customizable UI, Powerful search capabilities, Flexible ticket management, Robust access control and security, Scales well for growing teams, Active development community.

On the other hand, Request Tracker is a Business & Commerce product tagged with issue-tracking, request-management, bug-tracking, task-management.

Its standout features include Ticket tracking, Email handling, Web interface, Custom fields, Role-based access control, REST API, Integration with version control systems, SLAs and notifications, Reporting and dashboards, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Highly customizable, Powerful search and filtering, Great community support, Integrates with many tools, Scalable for large deployments.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Zammad

Zammad

Zammad is an open-source helpdesk and customer support system. It features ticket management, knowledge base, customer portal, and integrations with various other business systems. Zammad aims to provide an affordable alternative to expensive commercial systems with similar functionality.

Categories:
helpdesk ticketing knowledge-base customer-portal

Zammad Features

  1. Ticketing system for managing customer support requests
  2. Knowledge base for self-service help
  3. Customer portal for account management
  4. SLA and escalation management
  5. Reporting and analytics
  6. Email piping and POP3/IMAP import
  7. REST API and webhooks
  8. Multi-channel support (email, social media, chat, etc)
  9. Customizable workflows
  10. Role-based access control
  11. Multi-language support
  12. Integration with LDAP, SAML, CalDAV

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Easy to install and configure

Intuitive and customizable UI

Powerful search capabilities

Flexible ticket management

Robust access control and security

Scales well for growing teams

Active development community

Cons

Limited native mobile apps

Less extensive marketplace of third-party integrations

Steeper learning curve than some commercial options

Lacks some advanced reporting features

Can require more self-management than SaaS options


Request Tracker

Request Tracker

Request Tracker (RT) is an open source issue tracking system that allows organizations to manage requests, bugs, tasks, changes, documents and more in one place. It provides customization options and integrations for improved workflows.

Categories:
issue-tracking request-management bug-tracking task-management

Request Tracker Features

  1. Ticket tracking
  2. Email handling
  3. Web interface
  4. Custom fields
  5. Role-based access control
  6. REST API
  7. Integration with version control systems
  8. SLAs and notifications
  9. Reporting and dashboards

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Custom Pricing

Pros

Open source and free

Highly customizable

Powerful search and filtering

Great community support

Integrates with many tools

Scalable for large deployments

Cons

Steep learning curve

Can be complex to set up and manage

Limited native mobile support

Upgrades can be difficult

Not as user friendly as some options