ZITADEL vs Keycloak

Struggling to choose between ZITADEL and Keycloak? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ZITADEL is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like identity-management, access-management, authentication, authorization, single-signon.

It boasts features such as User management, Authentication, Authorization, Single sign-on, Multi-factor authentication, Social login, User management APIs and pros including Open source, Flexible and customizable, Scalable, Secure, Integrates with existing systems.

On the other hand, Keycloak is a Security & Privacy product tagged with authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

Feature	ZITADEL	Keycloak
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

ZITADEL

Description: ZITADEL is an open-source identity and access management solution. It allows organizations to manage user identities, authentication, and authorization. ZITADEL provides features like single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, social login, and user management APIs.

Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Key Features Comparison

ZITADEL Features

• User management
• Authentication
• Authorization
• Single sign-on
• Multi-factor authentication
• Social login
• User management APIs

Keycloak Features

• Single sign-on
• Identity brokering and social login
• User federation
• Client adapters
• Admin console

Pros & Cons Analysis

ZITADEL

Pros

• Open source
• Flexible and customizable
• Scalable
• Secure
• Integrates with existing systems

Cons

• Requires technical expertise to set up and manage
• Limited support compared to commercial solutions
• May require additional components for full functionality

Keycloak

Pros

• Open source
• Easy integration
• Flexible and customizable
• Robust access management capabilities

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex configuration
• Limited native reporting capabilities

Pricing Comparison

ZITADEL

• Open Source

Keycloak

• Open Source