Keycloak vs Okta

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Keycloak icon
Keycloak
Okta icon
Okta

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Keycloak and Okta? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Keycloak is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

It boasts features such as Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console and pros including Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

On the other hand, Okta is a Security & Privacy product tagged with identity-management, access-management, single-signon, multifactor-authentication.

Its standout features include Single Sign-On (SSO), Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Lifecycle Management, Universal Directory, API Access Management, Adaptive Risk-based Authentication, and it shines with pros like Comprehensive identity management capabilities, Intuitive admin interface, Integration with many apps and services, Strong security and compliance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Keycloak and Okta?

When evaluating Keycloak versus Okta, both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Keycloak and Okta have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include authentication, authorization, user-management.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Keycloak and Okta significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include authentication, authorization and identity-management, access-management.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Keycloak and Okta. You might also explore authentication, authorization, user-management for alternative approaches.

Feature Keycloak Okta
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Okta
Okta

Description: Okta is an identity and access management platform that enables organizations to securely connect people to technology. It provides single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, lifecycle management, and more to help IT teams manage user identities.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak Features
  • Single sign-on
  • Identity brokering and social login
  • User federation
  • Client adapters
  • Admin console
Okta
Okta Features
  • Single Sign-On (SSO)
  • Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
  • Lifecycle Management
  • Universal Directory
  • API Access Management
  • Adaptive Risk-based Authentication

Pros & Cons Analysis

Keycloak
Keycloak
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy integration
  • Flexible and customizable
  • Robust access management capabilities
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex configuration
  • Limited native reporting capabilities
Okta
Okta
Pros
  • Comprehensive identity management capabilities
  • Intuitive admin interface
  • Integration with many apps and services
  • Strong security and compliance
Cons
  • Can be complex for smaller businesses
  • Requires expertise to fully utilize features
  • Must pay extra for some advanced features

Pricing Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
  • Open Source
Okta
Okta
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs