ZOC vs KiTTY

Struggling to choose between ZOC and KiTTY? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ZOC is a Network & Admin solution with tags like ssh, telnet, rlogin, terminal, emulation, client.

It boasts features such as Terminal emulation for various protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, TN3270, Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions, Scripting and automation using macros, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, SFTP browser and client, Port forwarding, jump hosts, Scrollback buffer, Dark mode and pros including Supports many protocols and systems, Very customizable and scriptable, Clean and intuitive interface, Stable and reliable, Good performance.

On the other hand, KiTTY is a Network & Admin product tagged with ssh, telnet, terminal, remote-access.

Its standout features include Tabbed interface, Automatic session name generation, Ability to launch multiple sessions in tabs, Session logging, Transparency effects, Automatic command execution on login, and it shines with pros like Enhanced features compared to PuTTY, Lightweight and fast, Open source and free, Supports many network protocols, Highly customizable.

Feature	ZOC	KiTTY
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

ZOC

Description: ZOC is a professional terminal emulation and SSH client for macOS and Windows. It allows you to connect to servers and mainframes via protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, and others. ZOC has a clean interface, supports macros, scrollback buffer, multiple tabs and windows.

KiTTY

Description: KiTTY is an enhanced fork of PuTTY, the popular open-source Telnet and SSH client. KiTTY adds several features like transparency and session logging that are missing in PuTTY.

Key Features Comparison

ZOC Features

• Terminal emulation for various protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, TN3270
• Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions
• Scripting and automation using macros
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• SFTP browser and client
• Port forwarding, jump hosts
• Scrollback buffer
• Dark mode

KiTTY Features

• Tabbed interface
• Automatic session name generation
• Ability to launch multiple sessions in tabs
• Session logging
• Transparency effects
• Automatic command execution on login

Pros & Cons Analysis

ZOC

Pros

• Supports many protocols and systems
• Very customizable and scriptable
• Clean and intuitive interface
• Stable and reliable
• Good performance

Cons

• Expensive compared to competitors
• Limited file transfer capabilities
• No built-in serial port support

KiTTY

Pros

• Enhanced features compared to PuTTY
• Lightweight and fast
• Open source and free
• Supports many network protocols
• Highly customizable

Cons

• No native macOS or Linux version
• Limited to Windows platform only
• No built-in file transfer support
• Steep learning curve for first-time users

Pricing Comparison

ZOC

• One-time Purchase
• Subscription-Based

KiTTY

• Free
• Open Source