ZOC vs PuTTY

Struggling to choose between ZOC and PuTTY? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ZOC is a Network & Admin solution with tags like ssh, telnet, rlogin, terminal, emulation, client.

It boasts features such as Terminal emulation for various protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, TN3270, Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions, Scripting and automation using macros, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, SFTP browser and client, Port forwarding, jump hosts, Scrollback buffer, Dark mode and pros including Supports many protocols and systems, Very customizable and scriptable, Clean and intuitive interface, Stable and reliable, Good performance.

On the other hand, PuTTY is a Network & Admin product tagged with terminal-emulator, ssh-client, remote-access, command-line.

Its standout features include SSH client, Telnet client, Rlogin client, Raw socket connection, Serial port connection, Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP), Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies, Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation), Configurable keyboard shortcuts, Session logging, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Lightweight and fast, Supports multiple network protocols, Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms, Highly configurable with many options, Actively developed and maintained.

Feature	ZOC	PuTTY
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

ZOC

Description: ZOC is a professional terminal emulation and SSH client for macOS and Windows. It allows you to connect to servers and mainframes via protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, and others. ZOC has a clean interface, supports macros, scrollback buffer, multiple tabs and windows.

PuTTY

Description: PuTTY is a popular open-source terminal emulator and SSH client for Windows. Developed by Simon Tatham, PuTTY provides a lightweight and versatile tool for connecting to remote servers using various network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin. It is widely used for secure and convenient command-line access to remote systems.

Key Features Comparison

ZOC Features

• Terminal emulation for various protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, TN3270
• Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions
• Scripting and automation using macros
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• SFTP browser and client
• Port forwarding, jump hosts
• Scrollback buffer
• Dark mode

PuTTY Features

• SSH client
• Telnet client
• Rlogin client
• Raw socket connection
• Serial port connection
• Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP)
• Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies
• Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation)
• Configurable keyboard shortcuts
• Session logging

Pros & Cons Analysis

ZOC

Pros

• Supports many protocols and systems
• Very customizable and scriptable
• Clean and intuitive interface
• Stable and reliable
• Good performance

Cons

• Expensive compared to competitors
• Limited file transfer capabilities
• No built-in serial port support

PuTTY

Pros

• Free and open source
• Lightweight and fast
• Supports multiple network protocols
• Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms
• Highly configurable with many options
• Actively developed and maintained

Cons

• Official builds only for Windows
• Limited file transfer capabilities compared to FTP/SFTP clients
• Minimalist interface lacks some conveniences of other SSH clients
• Lacks advanced SSH features like agent forwarding or port tunneling
• No official support offered

Pricing Comparison

ZOC

• One-time Purchase
• Subscription-Based

PuTTY

• Free
• Open Source