ZOC vs Solar-PuTTY

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

ZOC icon
ZOC
Solar-PuTTY icon
Solar-PuTTY

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between ZOC and Solar-PuTTY? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ZOC is a Network & Admin solution with tags like ssh, telnet, rlogin, terminal, emulation, client.

It boasts features such as Terminal emulation for various protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, TN3270, Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions, Scripting and automation using macros, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, SFTP browser and client, Port forwarding, jump hosts, Scrollback buffer, Dark mode and pros including Supports many protocols and systems, Very customizable and scriptable, Clean and intuitive interface, Stable and reliable, Good performance.

On the other hand, Solar-PuTTY is a Network & Admin product tagged with ssh, telnet, remote-access, open-source.

Its standout features include Open source SSH and telnet client, Based on PuTTY with additional features, Ability to store session data in the cloud, Supports SSH and telnet protocols, Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions, Automatic session restoration, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, SFTP client and file transfer support, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Lightweight and fast, Easy to use familiar interface, Stores sessions in the cloud for portability, Supports many network protocols, Active development and community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare ZOC and Solar-PuTTY?

When evaluating ZOC versus Solar-PuTTY, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

ZOC and Solar-PuTTY have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include ssh, telnet, rlogin.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between ZOC and Solar-PuTTY significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include ssh, telnet, rlogin, terminal.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include ssh, telnet and ssh, telnet.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between ZOC and Solar-PuTTY. You might also explore ssh, telnet, rlogin for alternative approaches.

Feature ZOC Solar-PuTTY
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

ZOC
ZOC

Description: ZOC is a professional terminal emulation and SSH client for macOS and Windows. It allows you to connect to servers and mainframes via protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, and others. ZOC has a clean interface, supports macros, scrollback buffer, multiple tabs and windows.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Solar-PuTTY
Solar-PuTTY

Description: Solar-PuTTY is an open-source, free SSH and telnet client for Windows operating systems. It is based on the popular PuTTY application but with additional features like the ability to store session data in the cloud.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

ZOC
ZOC Features
  • Terminal emulation for various protocols like SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, TN3270
  • Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions
  • Scripting and automation using macros
  • Customizable keyboard shortcuts
  • SFTP browser and client
  • Port forwarding, jump hosts
  • Scrollback buffer
  • Dark mode
Solar-PuTTY
Solar-PuTTY Features
  • Open source SSH and telnet client
  • Based on PuTTY with additional features
  • Ability to store session data in the cloud
  • Supports SSH and telnet protocols
  • Tabbed interface for managing multiple sessions
  • Automatic session restoration
  • Customizable keyboard shortcuts
  • SFTP client and file transfer support

Pros & Cons Analysis

ZOC
ZOC
Pros
  • Supports many protocols and systems
  • Very customizable and scriptable
  • Clean and intuitive interface
  • Stable and reliable
  • Good performance
Cons
  • Expensive compared to competitors
  • Limited file transfer capabilities
  • No built-in serial port support
Solar-PuTTY
Solar-PuTTY
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Easy to use familiar interface
  • Stores sessions in the cloud for portability
  • Supports many network protocols
  • Active development and community support
Cons
  • Lacks some PuTTY features like local session storage
  • No native support for RDP or VNC
  • Setup requires account creation
  • Cloud storage raises some privacy concerns

Pricing Comparison

ZOC
ZOC
  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based
Solar-PuTTY
Solar-PuTTY
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs