Zuul vs Earthly

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Zuul icon
Zuul
Earthly icon
Earthly

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Zuul and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Zuul is a Network & Admin solution with tags like api-gateway, edge-service, routing, monitoring, resiliency, security.

It boasts features such as Dynamic routing, Load balancing, Resiliency, Security, Insights and monitoring and pros including Open source, Flexible, Scalable, Robust feature set.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Zuul and Earthly?

When evaluating Zuul versus Earthly, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Zuul and Earthly have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include api-gateway, edge-service, routing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Zuul and Earthly significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include api-gateway, edge-service, routing, monitoring.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include api-gateway, edge-service and build, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Zuul and Earthly. You might also explore api-gateway, edge-service, routing for alternative approaches.

Feature Zuul Earthly
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Zuul
Zuul

Description: Zuul is an open source API gateway and edge service used for dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency and security. It handles authentication, insights, stress testing, canary deployments and much more.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Zuul
Zuul Features
  • Dynamic routing
  • Load balancing
  • Resiliency
  • Security
  • Insights and monitoring
Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Zuul
Zuul
Pros
  • Open source
  • Flexible
  • Scalable
  • Robust feature set
Cons
  • Complex configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • No GUI
Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Zuul
Zuul
  • Open Source
Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs