Atomic Game Engine vs Urho3D

Struggling to choose between Atomic Game Engine and Urho3D? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Atomic Game Engine is a Gaming Software solution with tags like 2d, 3d, javascript, typescript, crossplatform.

It boasts features such as Node-based visual editor, Cross-platform support for Windows, Mac, Linux, Web, Android and iOS, Uses JavaScript and TypeScript for scripting, Integrated physics engine, Asset pipeline for importing models, textures, audio, Visual scene editing, Debugging tools, Extensible through plugins and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use visual workflow, Rapid iteration and prototyping, Large community support.

On the other hand, Urho3D is a Gaming Software product tagged with 3d, crossplatform, c, game-engine.

Its standout features include Scene management, Rendering, Audio, Physics, Networking, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Cross-platform - supports desktop, mobile and web, Good documentation and active community support.

Feature	Atomic Game Engine	Urho3D
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Gaming Software	Gaming Software

Product Overview

Atomic Game Engine

Description: The Atomic Game Engine is a free, open source 2D and 3D game engine with a node-based visual editor. It allows developers to create cross-platform games for Windows, Mac, Linux, Web, Android, and iOS using JavaScript and TypeScript.

Urho3D

Description: Urho3D is a free and open source cross-platform 2D and 3D game engine. It provides features such as scene management, rendering, audio, physics, and networking for building games and 3D applications across desktop, mobile, and web platforms.

Key Features Comparison

Atomic Game Engine Features

• Node-based visual editor
• Cross-platform support for Windows, Mac, Linux, Web, Android and iOS
• Uses JavaScript and TypeScript for scripting
• Integrated physics engine
• Asset pipeline for importing models, textures, audio
• Visual scene editing
• Debugging tools
• Extensible through plugins

Urho3D Features

• Scene management
• Rendering
• Audio
• Physics
• Networking

Pros & Cons Analysis

Atomic Game Engine

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to use visual workflow
• Rapid iteration and prototyping
• Large community support

Cons

• Limited compared to full game engines like Unity and Unreal
• Less optimized runtime performance
• Limited advanced graphics features

Urho3D

Pros

• Free and open source
• Cross-platform - supports desktop, mobile and web
• Good documentation and active community support

Cons

• Less features compared to commercial engines like Unity and Unreal
• Limited platform support compared to engines like Godot
• Smaller user and asset base

Pricing Comparison

Atomic Game Engine

• Open Source

Urho3D

• Open Source