Bazel vs GNU Make

Struggling to choose between Bazel and GNU Make? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bazel is a Development solution with tags like build-tool, incremental-builds, multilanguage.

It boasts features such as Fast, incremental builds, Scales to very large codebases, Language-agnostic, Hermetic and reproducible builds, Supports multiple platforms and pros including Very fast build times, Easily build large projects, Reproducible builds, Language-agnostic, Active open source community.

On the other hand, GNU Make is a Development product tagged with build, automation, make, compiler.

Its standout features include Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files, Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously, Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks, Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively, Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching, Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles, and it shines with pros like Widely used and well-supported, Mature and stable, Powerful dependency tracking, Built-in parallelism, Portable across platforms, Integrates well with other tools.

Feature	Bazel	GNU Make
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Bazel

Description: Bazel is an open-source build and test tool similar to Make, Maven, or Gradle. It is optimized for building large, multi-language software projects efficiently by incrementally building only what has changed.

GNU Make

Description: GNU Make is a utility that automatically builds executable programs and libraries from source code by reading files called Makefiles which specify how to derive the target program. It allows users to easily compile large projects without manually issuing the compilation commands.

Key Features Comparison

Bazel Features

• Fast, incremental builds
• Scales to very large codebases
• Language-agnostic
• Hermetic and reproducible builds
• Supports multiple platforms

GNU Make Features

• Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files
• Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously
• Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks
• Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively
• Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching
• Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bazel

Pros

• Very fast build times
• Easily build large projects
• Reproducible builds
• Language-agnostic
• Active open source community

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Requires buy-in from entire team
• Not as feature-rich as alternatives like Gradle

GNU Make

Pros

• Widely used and well-supported
• Mature and stable
• Powerful dependency tracking
• Built-in parallelism
• Portable across platforms
• Integrates well with other tools

Cons

• Cryptic syntax
• Difficult for complex builds
• Only rebuilds out-of-date targets
• Not suitable for all project types
• Limited to makefile build process

Pricing Comparison

Bazel

• Open Source

GNU Make

• Open Source