Blazor vs Uno Platform

Struggling to choose between Blazor and Uno Platform? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Blazor is a Development solution with tags like c, net, webassembly, spa.

It boasts features such as Runs .NET code natively in the browser via WebAssembly, Lets you build interactive web UIs using C# instead of JavaScript, Supports Razor syntax for combining HTML markup and C# code, Includes routing, dependency injection and other .NET features, Can leverage existing .NET code, libraries and tools, Integrates with ASP.NET Core backend services and pros including Write entire web apps in C# without JavaScript, Use existing .NET skills and code, Get native performance with WebAssembly, Take advantage of .NET ecosystem and tools, Code sharing across server and client, Great for building interactive web UI quickly.

On the other hand, Uno Platform is a Development product tagged with c, xaml, mobile, desktop, web, open-source.

Its standout features include Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML, Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms, Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time, MVVM architecture support, Native performance and look & feel, Access to native APIs and SDKs, Open source under the MIT license, and it shines with pros like Single codebase for multiple platforms, Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills, Rapid development with Hot Reload, Native performance unlike hybrid approaches, Free and open source.

Feature	Blazor	Uno Platform
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Blazor

Description: Blazor is a free, open-source web framework that allows developers to create web apps using C# and HTML. It uses WebAssembly to run .NET code in the browser instead of JavaScript. Blazor is useful for building interactive UI quickly with .NET.

Uno Platform

Description: Uno Platform is an open-source UI framework that allows you to build native mobile, desktop and web applications using C# and XAML from a single codebase. It leverages XAML from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms.

Key Features Comparison

Blazor Features

• Runs .NET code natively in the browser via WebAssembly
• Lets you build interactive web UIs using C# instead of JavaScript
• Supports Razor syntax for combining HTML markup and C# code
• Includes routing, dependency injection and other .NET features
• Can leverage existing .NET code, libraries and tools
• Integrates with ASP.NET Core backend services

Uno Platform Features

• Write once, run everywhere (mobile, desktop, web) using C# and XAML
• Leverages existing XAML knowledge from WPF, UWP and Xamarin.Forms
• Hot Reload to see UI changes in real-time
• MVVM architecture support
• Native performance and look & feel
• Access to native APIs and SDKs
• Open source under the MIT license

Pros & Cons Analysis

Blazor

Pros

• Write entire web apps in C# without JavaScript
• Use existing .NET skills and code
• Get native performance with WebAssembly
• Take advantage of .NET ecosystem and tools
• Code sharing across server and client
• Great for building interactive web UI quickly

Cons

• WebAssembly support still maturing across browsers
• Limited browser API access compared to JavaScript
• Not as mature as JavaScript frameworks yet
• Hosting and deployment requires some configuration
• C# in browser may have learning curve for some devs

Uno Platform

Pros

• Single codebase for multiple platforms
• Productivity boost from reusing XAML skills
• Rapid development with Hot Reload
• Native performance unlike hybrid approaches
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited number of controls compared to WPF
• Smaller community than alternatives like React Native
• Still evolving with breaking changes
• Limited documentation

Pricing Comparison

Blazor

• Open Source
• Free

Uno Platform

• Open Source