BoxCryptor Classic vs Cryptomator

Struggling to choose between BoxCryptor Classic and Cryptomator? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

BoxCryptor Classic is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like encryption, privacy, security, cloud-storage.

It boasts features such as AES-256 encryption, Encrypt files and folders in cloud storage services, Available for Windows, macOS, iOS and Android, Can encrypt data in Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, etc, Free and paid versions available, Can share encrypted files and folders securely and pros including Strong AES-256 bit encryption, Works across platforms and devices, Integrates with many popular cloud storage providers, Easy to use interface, Can selectively encrypt only sensitive files, Free version available with 2GB storage limit.

On the other hand, Cryptomator is a Security & Privacy product tagged with encryption, privacy, security, opensource, crossplatform.

Its standout features include Client-side encryption, Open source software, Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS, Integrates with cloud storage providers like Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, etc, Uses AES-256 and HMAC-SHA256 encryption standards, Vaults can be unlocked manually or via master password, Selective sync - choose which files/folders to sync, Community-driven development model, and it shines with pros like Strong encryption protects files in cloud storage, Free and open source - no licensing costs, Easy to use with drag and drop functionality, Works across all major platforms, Integrates seamlessly with existing cloud storage services, Active development community improves software continuously.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

BoxCryptor Classic

BoxCryptor Classic

Boxcryptor Classic is an encryption software that allows users to encrypt files and folders in cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive and many more. It provides AES-256 encryption to secure sensitive data.

Categories:
encryption privacy security cloud-storage

BoxCryptor Classic Features

  1. AES-256 encryption
  2. Encrypt files and folders in cloud storage services
  3. Available for Windows, macOS, iOS and Android
  4. Can encrypt data in Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, etc
  5. Free and paid versions available
  6. Can share encrypted files and folders securely

Pricing

  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Strong AES-256 bit encryption

Works across platforms and devices

Integrates with many popular cloud storage providers

Easy to use interface

Can selectively encrypt only sensitive files

Free version available with 2GB storage limit

Cons

Paid plans can get expensive for large storage needs

No offline access to encrypted files

Limited native integrations with cloud storage providers

Free version has limited storage and features


Cryptomator

Cryptomator

Cryptomator is a free, open-source software used to encrypt your cloud files locally before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, etc. It works across platforms like Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, and iOS.

Categories:
encryption privacy security opensource crossplatform

Cryptomator Features

  1. Client-side encryption
  2. Open source software
  3. Cross-platform - works on Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS
  4. Integrates with cloud storage providers like Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, etc
  5. Uses AES-256 and HMAC-SHA256 encryption standards
  6. Vaults can be unlocked manually or via master password
  7. Selective sync - choose which files/folders to sync
  8. Community-driven development model

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Strong encryption protects files in cloud storage

Free and open source - no licensing costs

Easy to use with drag and drop functionality

Works across all major platforms

Integrates seamlessly with existing cloud storage services

Active development community improves software continuously

Cons

Can experience sync issues in some cases

No cloud storage provided - relies on third party services

Mobile apps lack some advanced desktop features

No built-in collaboration features

Requires some technical knowledge to setup and use