Cyclic vs Travis CI

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Cyclic icon
Cyclic
Travis CI icon
Travis CI

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Cyclic and Travis CI? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cyclic is a Development solution with tags like api, testing, debugging.

It boasts features such as Send API requests, Import and export collections, Environment and global variables, Code generation, Authentication helpers, Test scripts and pros including Free and open source, Intuitive UI, Powerful functionality, Cross-platform support, Active community.

On the other hand, Travis CI is a Development product tagged with ci, testing, deployment, github.

Its standout features include Automated builds and testing, Easy integration with GitHub, Supports many languages and frameworks, Parallel testing, Caching for faster builds, Notifications via email, IRC, Campfire etc, Ability to deploy to various platforms, Customizable build configuration, Access to build logs, and it shines with pros like Free for open source projects, Easy setup with GitHub integration, Fast and reliable builds, Good notification options, Good documentation and community support, Many add-ons and integrations available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Cyclic and Travis CI?

When evaluating Cyclic versus Travis CI, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Cyclic and Travis CI have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include api, testing, debugging.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Cyclic and Travis CI significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include api, testing, debugging.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include api, testing and ci, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Cyclic and Travis CI. You might also explore api, testing, debugging for alternative approaches.

Feature Cyclic Travis CI
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Cyclic
Cyclic

Description: Cyclic is an open-source alternative to Postman for API testing and development. It allows developers to easily send requests to test and debug APIs and offers features like variables, collections, environments, and automated tests.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Travis CI
Travis CI

Description: Travis CI is a hosted continuous integration service used to build, test, and deploy software projects hosted at GitHub. It is free for open source projects.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Cyclic
Cyclic Features
  • Send API requests
  • Import and export collections
  • Environment and global variables
  • Code generation
  • Authentication helpers
  • Test scripts
Travis CI
Travis CI Features
  • Automated builds and testing
  • Easy integration with GitHub
  • Supports many languages and frameworks
  • Parallel testing
  • Caching for faster builds
  • Notifications via email, IRC, Campfire etc
  • Ability to deploy to various platforms
  • Customizable build configuration
  • Access to build logs

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cyclic
Cyclic
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Intuitive UI
  • Powerful functionality
  • Cross-platform support
  • Active community
Cons
  • Limited documentation
  • Less extensions than Postman
  • Steeper learning curve than Postman
Travis CI
Travis CI
Pros
  • Free for open source projects
  • Easy setup with GitHub integration
  • Fast and reliable builds
  • Good notification options
  • Good documentation and community support
  • Many add-ons and integrations available
Cons
  • Limited free plan for private repos
  • Can be slow for larger projects
  • Limited customization on free plan
  • No native Windows or mobile support
  • No on-premises self-hosted option

Pricing Comparison

Cyclic
Cyclic
  • Open Source
  • Free
Travis CI
Travis CI
  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs