Duplicati vs Time Machine for Linux

Struggling to choose between Duplicati and Time Machine for Linux? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Duplicati is a Backup & Sync solution with tags like encryption, incremental-backups, compression, cloud-storage, open-source.

It boasts features such as Incremental backups to minimize bandwidth requirements, Client-side AES-256 encryption, Supports multiple cloud storage providers (Amazon S3, OneDrive, Google Drive, etc), Open source and free, Deduplication to avoid uploading duplicate data, Scheduling and automation capabilities, Command line and web UI available, Backup verification and repair, Bandwidth throttling and pros including Free and open source, Strong encryption, Good choice of backend storage options, Easy to set up and use, Deduplication saves bandwidth, Wide platform support.

On the other hand, Time Machine for Linux is a Backup & Sync product tagged with backup, restore, incremental, external-drive.

Its standout features include Incremental backups to external drives, Easy point-in-time file restoration, Backup scheduling, Encryption support, Exclusion rules to skip files/folders, Backup integrity verification, Space efficient backups using hard links, Web-based user interface, and it shines with pros like Reliable and automated backups, Allows restoring previous versions of files, Open source and free, Customizable backup settings, Works on major Linux distros.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.