Skip to content

GlusterFS vs Norton Ghost

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs.

GlusterFS icon
GlusterFS
Norton Ghost icon
Norton Ghost

GlusterFS vs Norton Ghost: The Verdict

⚡ Summary:

GlusterFS: GlusterFS is an open source, distributed file system that can scale out to store petabytes of data. It aggregates disk storage across servers into a single global namespace.

Norton Ghost: Norton Ghost is a disk imaging and cloning software used to make exact copies of a computer's hard drive. It allows for easy backup, restoration, and migration of data and applications to a new hard drive or computer.

Both tools serve their respective audiences. Compare the features, pricing, and user ratings above to determine which best fits your needs.

Last updated: May 2026 · Comparison by Sugggest Editorial Team

Feature GlusterFS Norton Ghost
Sugggest Score
Category Network & Admin Backup & Sync
Pricing Open Source

Product Overview

GlusterFS
GlusterFS

Description: GlusterFS is an open source, distributed file system that can scale out to store petabytes of data. It aggregates disk storage across servers into a single global namespace.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Norton Ghost
Norton Ghost

Description: Norton Ghost is a disk imaging and cloning software used to make exact copies of a computer's hard drive. It allows for easy backup, restoration, and migration of data and applications to a new hard drive or computer.

Type: software

Key Features Comparison

GlusterFS
GlusterFS Features
  • Distributed file system
  • Scale-out network-attached storage
  • File replication and distribution
  • Strong consistency
  • Parallel access
  • Geo-replication
  • Automatic load balancing
Norton Ghost
Norton Ghost Features
  • Disk imaging and cloning
  • Backup and restore entire system or individual files
  • Schedule automatic backups
  • Incremental backups to save storage space
  • Migrate data and applications to new hard drive or computer
  • Bare metal restore to dissimilar hardware
  • Encryption and compression of backup images

Pros & Cons Analysis

GlusterFS
GlusterFS

Pros

  • High scalability
  • High availability
  • Good performance
  • Open source
  • Easy to use and manage
  • Works across physical locations

Cons

  • Complex initial setup
  • Steep learning curve
  • No built-in user management
  • Limited monitoring capabilities
  • No native encryption
Norton Ghost
Norton Ghost

Pros

  • Reliable and efficient full system backups
  • Easy migration to new hard drive or computer
  • Incremental backups save time and storage space
  • Bare metal restore capability
  • Encryption for security

Cons

  • Requires reboot to capture image of running OS
  • Limited scheduling options
  • No built-in file versioning
  • Expensive compared to some alternatives
  • Lacks cloud storage integration

Pricing Comparison

GlusterFS
GlusterFS
  • Open Source
Norton Ghost
Norton Ghost
  • Not listed

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs