GnuTLS vs wolfSSL

Struggling to choose between GnuTLS and wolfSSL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GnuTLS is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like tls, ssl, encryption, authentication, network-security.

It boasts features such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol implementation, X.509 certificate handling, Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) support, Encryption algorithms like AES, 3DES, ARCFOUR, etc., Authentication mechanisms like RSA, DSA, etc., Integrity protection through hash algorithms like SHA1, SHA256, etc., Application layer protocols like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc. and pros including Free and open source, Cross-platform availability, Regular updates and security fixes, Wide protocol and algorithm support, Integration with various applications and languages.

On the other hand, wolfSSL is a Security & Privacy product tagged with ssl, tls, cryptography, encryption, security.

Its standout features include Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation, Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc, Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile, Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management, Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache, Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols, Written in C for better performance and small footprint, Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency, Can be used with or without an OS layer, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast performance, Small code footprint suitable for embedded use, Portable across many platforms and architectures, Open source and free to use, Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites, Easy to integrate and use in existing apps, Good for constrained environments like IoT, Customizable build options.

Feature	GnuTLS	wolfSSL
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

GnuTLS

Description: GnuTLS is an open source software library that implements the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It provides encryption, authentication and integrity protection for network communication.

wolfSSL

Description: wolfSSL is an open source SSL/TLS library that is lightweight, portable, and provides encryption and authentication for applications. It supports common cipher suites and protocols, and has a small code footprint suitable for embedded systems.

Key Features Comparison

GnuTLS Features

• Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol implementation
• X.509 certificate handling
• Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) support
• Encryption algorithms like AES, 3DES, ARCFOUR, etc.
• Authentication mechanisms like RSA, DSA, etc.
• Integrity protection through hash algorithms like SHA1, SHA256, etc.
• Application layer protocols like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.

wolfSSL Features

• Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation
• Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc
• Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile
• Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management
• Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache
• Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols
• Written in C for better performance and small footprint
• Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency
• Can be used with or without an OS layer

Pros & Cons Analysis

GnuTLS

Pros

• Free and open source
• Cross-platform availability
• Regular updates and security fixes
• Wide protocol and algorithm support
• Integration with various applications and languages

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Limited documentation and support resources
• Fewer features compared to some commercial TLS libraries
• Lower adoption than OpenSSL

wolfSSL

Pros

• Lightweight and fast performance
• Small code footprint suitable for embedded use
• Portable across many platforms and architectures
• Open source and free to use
• Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites
• Easy to integrate and use in existing apps
• Good for constrained environments like IoT
• Customizable build options

Cons

• Lacks some advanced TLS features compared to OpenSSL
• Limited support for older platforms and compilers
• Smaller community than more popular SSL libraries
• Not as extensively battle-tested as older options
• Lacks bindings for some languages

Pricing Comparison

GnuTLS

• Open Source

wolfSSL

• Open Source
• Free