GnuTLS vs wolfSSL

Struggling to choose between GnuTLS and wolfSSL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GnuTLS is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like tls, ssl, encryption, authentication, network-security.

It boasts features such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol implementation, X.509 certificate handling, Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) support, Encryption algorithms like AES, 3DES, ARCFOUR, etc., Authentication mechanisms like RSA, DSA, etc., Integrity protection through hash algorithms like SHA1, SHA256, etc., Application layer protocols like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc. and pros including Free and open source, Cross-platform availability, Regular updates and security fixes, Wide protocol and algorithm support, Integration with various applications and languages.

On the other hand, wolfSSL is a Security & Privacy product tagged with ssl, tls, cryptography, encryption, security.

Its standout features include Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation, Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc, Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile, Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management, Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache, Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols, Written in C for better performance and small footprint, Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency, Can be used with or without an OS layer, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast performance, Small code footprint suitable for embedded use, Portable across many platforms and architectures, Open source and free to use, Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites, Easy to integrate and use in existing apps, Good for constrained environments like IoT, Customizable build options.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

GnuTLS

GnuTLS

GnuTLS is an open source software library that implements the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It provides encryption, authentication and integrity protection for network communication.

Categories:
tls ssl encryption authentication network-security

GnuTLS Features

  1. Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol implementation
  2. X.509 certificate handling
  3. Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) support
  4. Encryption algorithms like AES, 3DES, ARCFOUR, etc.
  5. Authentication mechanisms like RSA, DSA, etc.
  6. Integrity protection through hash algorithms like SHA1, SHA256, etc.
  7. Application layer protocols like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Cross-platform availability

Regular updates and security fixes

Wide protocol and algorithm support

Integration with various applications and languages

Cons

Complex configuration

Limited documentation and support resources

Fewer features compared to some commercial TLS libraries

Lower adoption than OpenSSL


wolfSSL

wolfSSL

wolfSSL is an open source SSL/TLS library that is lightweight, portable, and provides encryption and authentication for applications. It supports common cipher suites and protocols, and has a small code footprint suitable for embedded systems.

Categories:
ssl tls cryptography encryption security

WolfSSL Features

  1. Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation
  2. Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc
  3. Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile
  4. Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management
  5. Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache
  6. Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols
  7. Written in C for better performance and small footprint
  8. Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency
  9. Can be used with or without an OS layer

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Lightweight and fast performance

Small code footprint suitable for embedded use

Portable across many platforms and architectures

Open source and free to use

Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites

Easy to integrate and use in existing apps

Good for constrained environments like IoT

Customizable build options

Cons

Lacks some advanced TLS features compared to OpenSSL

Limited support for older platforms and compilers

Smaller community than more popular SSL libraries

Not as extensively battle-tested as older options

Lacks bindings for some languages