mbed TLS vs wolfSSL

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

mbed TLS icon
mbed TLS
wolfSSL icon
wolfSSL

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between mbed TLS and wolfSSL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

mbed TLS is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like cryptography, tls, ssl, embedded-systems.

It boasts features such as TLS/SSL protocol implementation, Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers, X.509 certificate handling, Authentication and encryption, Hardware acceleration support, Lightweight and modular codebase and pros including Free and open source, Compact code and small memory footprint, Highly configurable and customizable, Permissive Apache 2.0 license, Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures, Active development and maintenance.

On the other hand, wolfSSL is a Security & Privacy product tagged with ssl, tls, cryptography, encryption, security.

Its standout features include Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation, Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc, Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile, Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management, Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache, Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols, Written in C for better performance and small footprint, Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency, Can be used with or without an OS layer, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast performance, Small code footprint suitable for embedded use, Portable across many platforms and architectures, Open source and free to use, Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites, Easy to integrate and use in existing apps, Good for constrained environments like IoT, Customizable build options.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare mbed TLS and wolfSSL?

When evaluating mbed TLS versus wolfSSL, both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

mbed TLS and wolfSSL have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include cryptography, tls, ssl.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between mbed TLS and wolfSSL significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include cryptography, tls, ssl, embedded-systems.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include cryptography, tls and ssl, tls.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between mbed TLS and wolfSSL. You might also explore cryptography, tls, ssl for alternative approaches.

Feature mbed TLS wolfSSL
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

mbed TLS
mbed TLS

Description: mbed TLS is an open source cryptographic library that provides TLS and SSL capabilities for embedded devices. It is designed to be compact, fast, and flexible enough for both small and large embedded systems.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

wolfSSL
wolfSSL

Description: wolfSSL is an open source SSL/TLS library that is lightweight, portable, and provides encryption and authentication for applications. It supports common cipher suites and protocols, and has a small code footprint suitable for embedded systems.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

mbed TLS
mbed TLS Features
  • TLS/SSL protocol implementation
  • Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers
  • X.509 certificate handling
  • Authentication and encryption
  • Hardware acceleration support
  • Lightweight and modular codebase
wolfSSL
wolfSSL Features
  • Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation
  • Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc
  • Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile
  • Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management
  • Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache
  • Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols
  • Written in C for better performance and small footprint
  • Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency
  • Can be used with or without an OS layer

Pros & Cons Analysis

mbed TLS
mbed TLS
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Compact code and small memory footprint
  • Highly configurable and customizable
  • Permissive Apache 2.0 license
  • Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures
  • Active development and maintenance
Cons
  • Limited native HTTPS server implementation
  • Lacks some advanced TLS features
  • Not as widely used as OpenSSL
  • Requires cryptographic expertise to configure securely
  • Limited hardware acceleration support
wolfSSL
wolfSSL
Pros
  • Lightweight and fast performance
  • Small code footprint suitable for embedded use
  • Portable across many platforms and architectures
  • Open source and free to use
  • Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites
  • Easy to integrate and use in existing apps
  • Good for constrained environments like IoT
  • Customizable build options
Cons
  • Lacks some advanced TLS features compared to OpenSSL
  • Limited support for older platforms and compilers
  • Smaller community than more popular SSL libraries
  • Not as extensively battle-tested as older options
  • Lacks bindings for some languages

Pricing Comparison

mbed TLS
mbed TLS
  • Open Source
wolfSSL
wolfSSL
  • Open Source
  • Free

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs