IPFS vs Artefactual AtoM

Struggling to choose between IPFS and Artefactual AtoM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

IPFS is a Network & Admin solution with tags like p2p, distributed, decentralized, file-sharing.

It boasts features such as Decentralized file storage, Content-addressed file system, Peer-to-peer file transfer, Versioning and immutable data, Deduplication of files and pros including No single point of failure, Censorship resistant, Tamper proof, High availability, Efficient global file distribution.

On the other hand, Artefactual AtoM is a Education & Reference product tagged with archival-description, digital-preservation, open-source.

Its standout features include Web-based accessions management, Multi-level description standards support, Flexible metadata standards, Multilingual interface, Access controls and user permissions, Linked data support, Customizable workflows, Reporting and statistics, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, User-friendly interface, Standards compliant, Extensive customization options, Active development community.

Feature	IPFS	Artefactual AtoM
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Education & Reference

Product Overview

IPFS

Description: IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) is a peer-to-peer distributed file system that allows storing and sharing files in a decentralized way. It creates a resilient global file system without single points of failure.

Artefactual AtoM

Description: Artefactual AtoM is open source software for managing archival descriptions of physical and digital objects. It helps archivists, librarians, and researchers to publish and share archival descriptions and make collections accessible online.

Key Features Comparison

IPFS Features

• Decentralized file storage
• Content-addressed file system
• Peer-to-peer file transfer
• Versioning and immutable data
• Deduplication of files

Artefactual AtoM Features

• Web-based accessions management
• Multi-level description standards support
• Flexible metadata standards
• Multilingual interface
• Access controls and user permissions
• Linked data support
• Customizable workflows
• Reporting and statistics

Pros & Cons Analysis

IPFS

Pros

• No single point of failure
• Censorship resistant
• Tamper proof
• High availability
• Efficient global file distribution

Cons

• Complex to set up and manage
• Lower performance than centralized systems
• Requires more storage space due to duplication
• Not beginner friendly

Artefactual AtoM

Pros

• Open source and free
• User-friendly interface
• Standards compliant
• Extensive customization options
• Active development community

Cons

• Can be complex for smaller institutions
• Requires some technical expertise to install/configure
• Limited native digitization tools
• Less out-of-box functionality than some commercial products

Pricing Comparison

IPFS

• Open Source

Artefactual AtoM

• Open Source