Materialize vs Fluid 960 Grid System

Struggling to choose between Materialize and Fluid 960 Grid System? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Materialize is a Development solution with tags like material-design, responsive, ui-components, web-development.

It boasts features such as Responsive grid system, Pre-built UI components, Material Design principles, SASS-based styling, Customizable themes, JavaScript plugins and pros including Open source and free, Large component library, Good documentation, Active community support, Works with many frameworks, Mobile-friendly and responsive.

On the other hand, Fluid 960 Grid System is a Development product tagged with css, framework, grid, responsive-design.

Its standout features include 12 column responsive grid, Predefined CSS classes for layouts, Support for mobile, tablet, and desktop screens, Built-in print styles, Lightweight at only 3.5KB minified and gzipped, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn and implement, Flexible and customizable, Open source and free to use, Active community support, Works well with other frameworks like Bootstrap.

Feature	Materialize	Fluid 960 Grid System
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Materialize

Description: Materialize is an open-source front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides UI components like buttons, cards, navigation, grids, and more to help developers quickly build responsive web apps with a modern look and feel.

Fluid 960 Grid System

Description: The Fluid 960 Grid System is a popular open source CSS framework for creating responsive, flexible website layouts based on a 12-column grid. It allows for rapid development of sites that adapt smoothly across devices.

Key Features Comparison

Materialize Features

• Responsive grid system
• Pre-built UI components
• Material Design principles
• SASS-based styling
• Customizable themes
• JavaScript plugins

Fluid 960 Grid System Features

• 12 column responsive grid
• Predefined CSS classes for layouts
• Support for mobile, tablet, and desktop screens
• Built-in print styles
• Lightweight at only 3.5KB minified and gzipped

Pros & Cons Analysis

Materialize

Pros

• Open source and free
• Large component library
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Works with many frameworks
• Mobile-friendly and responsive

Cons

• Less customizable than other frameworks
• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature-rich as paid options
• Dependent on jQuery

Fluid 960 Grid System

Pros

• Easy to learn and implement
• Flexible and customizable
• Open source and free to use
• Active community support
• Works well with other frameworks like Bootstrap

Cons

• Not as feature-rich as some other frameworks
• Limited built-in components
• May require additional CSS for full customization
• Not frequently updated anymore

Pricing Comparison

Materialize

• Open Source

Fluid 960 Grid System

• Open Source