Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs Qualibrate

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and Qualibrate? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, Qualibrate is a Business & Commerce product tagged with compliance, quality-management, risk-management, workflow-automation.

Its standout features include Centralized policy and compliance management, Automated control testing and scheduling, Risk register and heat mapping, Audit management and tracking, Corrective action planning, Customizable dashboards and reporting, and it shines with pros like Comprehensive features for compliance and quality management, Highly configurable and customizable, Automates manual processes, Centralized system for all GRC activities, Easy to use and implement.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	Qualibrate
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Business & Commerce

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Qualibrate

Description: Qualibrate is a compliance and quality management software that helps organizations efficiently manage policies, controls, risks, assessments, issues and tasks. It provides a centralized platform to design frameworks, automate workflows, assign tasks, track metrics and generate reports.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Qualibrate Features

• Centralized policy and compliance management
• Automated control testing and scheduling
• Risk register and heat mapping
• Audit management and tracking
• Corrective action planning
• Customizable dashboards and reporting

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Qualibrate

Pros

• Comprehensive features for compliance and quality management
• Highly configurable and customizable
• Automates manual processes
• Centralized system for all GRC activities
• Easy to use and implement

Cons

• Can be complex for smaller businesses
• Steep learning curve
• Limited native integrations with other systems
• Mobile access requires Citrix
• Support and implementation services are expensive

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

Qualibrate

• Subscription-Based