Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs WatiN

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and WatiN? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, WatiN is a Development product tagged with test-automation, web-testing, net, ui-testing.

Its standout features include Automated web application testing, Supports IE, Firefox and Chrome browsers, Interact with web pages like a real user, Find and interact with web page elements, Execute JavaScript on pages, Take screenshots of web pages, Integrates with unit testing frameworks, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to learn and use, Active community support, Integrates with .NET languages and tools, Cross-browser testing capabilities, Supports latest web technologies.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	WatiN
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

WatiN

Description: WatiN is an open source test automation framework for testing web applications in .NET. It allows you to create automated UI tests to simulate user interactions and validate functionality and behavior.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

WatiN Features

• Automated web application testing
• Supports IE, Firefox and Chrome browsers
• Interact with web pages like a real user
• Find and interact with web page elements
• Execute JavaScript on pages
• Take screenshots of web pages
• Integrates with unit testing frameworks

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

WatiN

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to learn and use
• Active community support
• Integrates with .NET languages and tools
• Cross-browser testing capabilities
• Supports latest web technologies

Cons

• Only for .NET stack
• Limited to web testing
• Not ideal for complex AJAX applications
• Development has slowed down recently

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

WatiN

• Open Source