MongoDB vs CockroachDB

Struggling to choose between MongoDB and CockroachDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

MongoDB is a Development solution with tags like nosql, document-database, open-source.

It boasts features such as Document-oriented storage, Automatic sharding, Rich and expressive query language, High availability, Horizontal scalability and pros including Flexible schema, High performance, Easy scalability, Rich query capabilities, High availability.

On the other hand, CockroachDB is a Development product tagged with distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant, sql.

Its standout features include Distributed SQL database, Horizontal scaling, High availability, Fault tolerance, ACID transactions, Multi-datacenter support, SQL compatibility, Automatic replication and failover, Geo-distributed deployments, Automated data balancing, SQL access for applications, and it shines with pros like Scalable and highly available, Consistent and durable data, Automatic failover and recovery, SQL compatibility for easy migration, Open-source and community-driven, Cloud-native architecture.

Feature	MongoDB	CockroachDB
Overall Score	1	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

MongoDB

Description: MongoDB is a popular open-source, document-oriented NoSQL database. It stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, rather than rows and columns used in traditional RDBMS. MongoDB is scalable, high-performance and easy to use.

CockroachDB

Description: CockroachDB is an open-source, distributed SQL database that scales horizontally with high availability to tolerate failures and supports strongly consistent ACID transactions. It aims to provide scalability, survivability, and data consistency across multiple datacenters.

Key Features Comparison

MongoDB Features

• Document-oriented storage
• Automatic sharding
• Rich and expressive query language
• High availability
• Horizontal scalability

CockroachDB Features

• Distributed SQL database
• Horizontal scaling
• High availability
• Fault tolerance
• ACID transactions
• Multi-datacenter support
• SQL compatibility
• Automatic replication and failover
• Geo-distributed deployments
• Automated data balancing
• SQL access for applications

Pros & Cons Analysis

MongoDB

Pros

• Flexible schema
• High performance
• Easy scalability
• Rich query capabilities
• High availability

Cons

• No transactions
• No joins
• Limited query flexibility compared to SQL
• Steep learning curve

CockroachDB

Pros

• Scalable and highly available
• Consistent and durable data
• Automatic failover and recovery
• SQL compatibility for easy migration
• Open-source and community-driven
• Cloud-native architecture

Cons

• Complexity of managing a distributed system
• Limited ecosystem and tooling compared to traditional databases
• Higher hardware requirements for production deployments
• Potential performance overhead due to distributed nature

Pricing Comparison

MongoDB

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based

CockroachDB

• Open Source