mrxvt vs PuTTY

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

mrxvt icon
mrxvt
PuTTY icon
PuTTY

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between mrxvt and PuTTY? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

mrxvt is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like terminal, emulator, x11, lightweight.

It boasts features such as Tabbed interface, Lightweight and fast, True transparency support, Customizable key bindings, Mouse wheel scrolling and pros including Low memory and CPU usage, Faster than other terminal emulators, Supports different visual styles, Easy to configure and customize.

On the other hand, PuTTY is a Network & Admin product tagged with terminal-emulator, ssh-client, remote-access, command-line.

Its standout features include SSH client, Telnet client, Rlogin client, Raw socket connection, Serial port connection, Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP), Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies, Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation), Configurable keyboard shortcuts, Session logging, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Lightweight and fast, Supports multiple network protocols, Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms, Highly configurable with many options, Actively developed and maintained.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare mrxvt and PuTTY?

When evaluating mrxvt versus PuTTY, both solutions serve different needs within the os & utilities ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

mrxvt and PuTTY have established themselves in the os & utilities market. Key areas include terminal, emulator, x11.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between mrxvt and PuTTY significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include terminal, emulator, x11, lightweight.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include terminal, emulator and terminal-emulator, ssh-client.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between mrxvt and PuTTY. You might also explore terminal, emulator, x11 for alternative approaches.

Feature mrxvt PuTTY
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Os & Utilities Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

mrxvt
mrxvt

Description: mrxvt is a lightweight tabbed terminal emulator for X11 environments. It is a fork of the popular rxvt terminal emulator and aims to improve performance and add additional features.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

PuTTY
PuTTY

Description: PuTTY is a popular open-source terminal emulator and SSH client for Windows. Developed by Simon Tatham, PuTTY provides a lightweight and versatile tool for connecting to remote servers using various network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin. It is widely used for secure and convenient command-line access to remote systems.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

mrxvt
mrxvt Features
  • Tabbed interface
  • Lightweight and fast
  • True transparency support
  • Customizable key bindings
  • Mouse wheel scrolling
PuTTY
PuTTY Features
  • SSH client
  • Telnet client
  • Rlogin client
  • Raw socket connection
  • Serial port connection
  • Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP)
  • Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies
  • Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation)
  • Configurable keyboard shortcuts
  • Session logging

Pros & Cons Analysis

mrxvt
mrxvt
Pros
  • Low memory and CPU usage
  • Faster than other terminal emulators
  • Supports different visual styles
  • Easy to configure and customize
Cons
  • Lacks some features of larger emulators
  • Configuration can be complex for beginners
  • No built-in scrollbar
PuTTY
PuTTY
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports multiple network protocols
  • Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms
  • Highly configurable with many options
  • Actively developed and maintained
Cons
  • Official builds only for Windows
  • Limited file transfer capabilities compared to FTP/SFTP clients
  • Minimalist interface lacks some conveniences of other SSH clients
  • Lacks advanced SSH features like agent forwarding or port tunneling
  • No official support offered

Pricing Comparison

mrxvt
mrxvt
  • Open Source
PuTTY
PuTTY
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs