Struggling to choose between OpenSupports and Zammad? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
OpenSupports is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like help-desk, ticketing-system, customer-support, open-source.
It boasts features such as Ticket management, Knowledge base, User roles and permissions, Email piping, REST API, Multi-language support and pros including Open source and free, Easy to install and use, Active community support, Customizable and extensible.
On the other hand, Zammad is a Business & Commerce product tagged with helpdesk, ticketing, knowledge-base, customer-portal.
Its standout features include Ticketing system for managing customer support requests, Knowledge base for self-service help, Customer portal for account management, SLA and escalation management, Reporting and analytics, Email piping and POP3/IMAP import, REST API and webhooks, Multi-channel support (email, social media, chat, etc), Customizable workflows, Role-based access control, Multi-language support, Integration with LDAP, SAML, CalDAV, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Intuitive and customizable UI, Powerful search capabilities, Flexible ticket management, Robust access control and security, Scales well for growing teams, Active development community.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
OpenSupports is an open-source help desk and customer support ticketing system. It allows companies to manage customer support requests and internal help desk tickets through a web-based interface.
Zammad is an open-source helpdesk and customer support system. It features ticket management, knowledge base, customer portal, and integrations with various other business systems. Zammad aims to provide an affordable alternative to expensive commercial systems with similar functionality.