Simple Grid vs Bulma

Struggling to choose between Simple Grid and Bulma? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Simple Grid is a Development solution with tags like css, grid, layout, responsive-design.

It boasts features such as Responsive grid system, Lightweight CSS framework, Intuitive class names, Open source & free and pros including Easy to use, Good for rapid prototyping, Works well for simple layouts, Customizable.

On the other hand, Bulma is a Development product tagged with css, frontend, flexbox, responsive, web-design.

Its standout features include Modular design, Mobile-first approach, Flexbox-based responsive layout, SASS source files, Customizable with CSS variables, Lightweight and fast, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn and use, Good documentation, Open source and free, Small file size, Flexibility and customizability, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Simple Grid

Simple Grid

Simple Grid is an open-source CSS grid framework for responsive web design. It provides a simple and lightweight grid system for building layouts with intuitive class names like .col-1-3 for spanning 1 out of 3 columns.

Categories:
css grid layout responsive-design

Simple Grid Features

  1. Responsive grid system
  2. Lightweight CSS framework
  3. Intuitive class names
  4. Open source & free

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Easy to use

Good for rapid prototyping

Works well for simple layouts

Customizable

Cons

Limited features compared to other CSS frameworks

Not ideal for complex layouts

Sparse documentation


Bulma

Bulma

Bulma is an open source CSS framework that provides ready-to-use frontend components that you can easily combine to build responsive web interfaces. Its design is based on Flexbox and it aims to provide an alternative to Bootstrap.

Categories:
css frontend flexbox responsive web-design

Bulma Features

  1. Modular design
  2. Mobile-first approach
  3. Flexbox-based responsive layout
  4. SASS source files
  5. Customizable with CSS variables
  6. Lightweight and fast

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Easy to learn and use

Good documentation

Open source and free

Small file size

Flexibility and customizability

Active community support

Cons

Less components than Bootstrap

Less browser support than Bootstrap

Less customization options out of the box

Less themes and templates available