Time Machine for Linux vs UrBackup

Struggling to choose between Time Machine for Linux and UrBackup? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Time Machine for Linux is a Backup & Sync solution with tags like backup, restore, incremental, external-drive.

It boasts features such as Incremental backups to external drives, Easy point-in-time file restoration, Backup scheduling, Encryption support, Exclusion rules to skip files/folders, Backup integrity verification, Space efficient backups using hard links, Web-based user interface and pros including Reliable and automated backups, Allows restoring previous versions of files, Open source and free, Customizable backup settings, Works on major Linux distros.

On the other hand, UrBackup is a Backup & Sync product tagged with opensource, clientserver, incremental, encryption, image, restore.

Its standout features include Client/server architecture, Incremental file backups, Full and incremental image backups, Client-side encryption, Web-based restores, Supports Windows, Linux and macOS, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Efficient incremental backups, Encryption for security, Easy web-based restores, Cross-platform support.

Feature	Time Machine for Linux	UrBackup
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Backup & Sync	Backup & Sync

Product Overview

Time Machine for Linux

Description: Time Machine for Linux is a backup software that provides functionality similar to Apple's Time Machine on Mac OS. It allows incremental backups to an external drive and easy restore of files.

UrBackup

Description: UrBackup is an open-source client/server backup software that allows incremental file and image backups. It supports Windows, Linux, and macOS, has client encryption and web-based restores.

Key Features Comparison

Time Machine for Linux Features

• Incremental backups to external drives
• Easy point-in-time file restoration
• Backup scheduling
• Encryption support
• Exclusion rules to skip files/folders
• Backup integrity verification
• Space efficient backups using hard links
• Web-based user interface

UrBackup Features

• Client/server architecture
• Incremental file backups
• Full and incremental image backups
• Client-side encryption
• Web-based restores
• Supports Windows, Linux and macOS

Pros & Cons Analysis

Time Machine for Linux

Pros

• Reliable and automated backups
• Allows restoring previous versions of files
• Open source and free
• Customizable backup settings
• Works on major Linux distros

Cons

• Limited support for NAS devices
• Steep learning curve
• No mobile app
• No cloud storage support
• Restores can be slow for large backups

UrBackup

Pros

• Open source and free
• Efficient incremental backups
• Encryption for security
• Easy web-based restores
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Initial full backup can be slow
• Limited reporting capabilities
• No mobile app
• Steep learning curve

Pricing Comparison

Time Machine for Linux

• Open Source

UrBackup

• Open Source