UrBackup vs Time Machine for Linux

Struggling to choose between UrBackup and Time Machine for Linux? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

UrBackup is a Backup & Sync solution with tags like opensource, clientserver, incremental, encryption, image, restore.

It boasts features such as Client/server architecture, Incremental file backups, Full and incremental image backups, Client-side encryption, Web-based restores, Supports Windows, Linux and macOS and pros including Open source and free, Efficient incremental backups, Encryption for security, Easy web-based restores, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Time Machine for Linux is a Backup & Sync product tagged with backup, restore, incremental, external-drive.

Its standout features include Incremental backups to external drives, Easy point-in-time file restoration, Backup scheduling, Encryption support, Exclusion rules to skip files/folders, Backup integrity verification, Space efficient backups using hard links, Web-based user interface, and it shines with pros like Reliable and automated backups, Allows restoring previous versions of files, Open source and free, Customizable backup settings, Works on major Linux distros.

Feature	UrBackup	Time Machine for Linux
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Backup & Sync	Backup & Sync

Product Overview

UrBackup

Description: UrBackup is an open-source client/server backup software that allows incremental file and image backups. It supports Windows, Linux, and macOS, has client encryption and web-based restores.

Time Machine for Linux

Description: Time Machine for Linux is a backup software that provides functionality similar to Apple's Time Machine on Mac OS. It allows incremental backups to an external drive and easy restore of files.

Key Features Comparison

UrBackup Features

• Client/server architecture
• Incremental file backups
• Full and incremental image backups
• Client-side encryption
• Web-based restores
• Supports Windows, Linux and macOS

Time Machine for Linux Features

• Incremental backups to external drives
• Easy point-in-time file restoration
• Backup scheduling
• Encryption support
• Exclusion rules to skip files/folders
• Backup integrity verification
• Space efficient backups using hard links
• Web-based user interface

Pros & Cons Analysis

UrBackup

Pros

• Open source and free
• Efficient incremental backups
• Encryption for security
• Easy web-based restores
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Initial full backup can be slow
• Limited reporting capabilities
• No mobile app
• Steep learning curve

Time Machine for Linux

Pros

• Reliable and automated backups
• Allows restoring previous versions of files
• Open source and free
• Customizable backup settings
• Works on major Linux distros

Cons

• Limited support for NAS devices
• Steep learning curve
• No mobile app
• No cloud storage support
• Restores can be slow for large backups

Pricing Comparison

UrBackup

• Open Source

Time Machine for Linux

• Open Source