VerneMQ vs CrystalMQ

Struggling to choose between VerneMQ and CrystalMQ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

VerneMQ is a Network & Admin solution with tags like mqtt, broker, messaging, iot, erlang.

It boasts features such as Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support, QOS 0, 1 and 2 support, SSL/TLS support, Websockets support, Clustering for high availability, Pluggable authentication and authorization, Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers, Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads, Plugin architecture to extend functionality, High performance and low memory footprint and pros including Open source and free to use, High performance and scalability, Built-in clustering for high availability, Supports latest MQTT protocol versions, Easy to deploy and configure, Active community support.

On the other hand, CrystalMQ is a Network & Admin product tagged with messaging, queueing, distributed-systems.

Its standout features include Open source and free, Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, STOMP, High performance and low latency, Horizontally scalable through sharding, Persistence using Redis or PostgreSQL, Supports clustering for high availability, Plugin architecture for extendibility, Admin dashboard and REST API for management, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast compared to many commercial MQ servers, Very scalable for high throughput needs, Supports many developer-friendly protocols out of the box, Easy to deploy, manage, and monitor, Open source with active community support.

Feature	VerneMQ	CrystalMQ
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

VerneMQ

Description: VerneMQ is an open-source, high-performance MQTT messaging broker written in Erlang. It is scalable, fault-tolerant and easy to set up. VerneMQ can handle thousands of MQTT clients on a single server instance.

CrystalMQ

Description: CrystalMQ is an open-source message queuing software that enables asynchronous message-based communication between distributed applications. It is lightweight, fast, and scalable.

Key Features Comparison

VerneMQ Features

• Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support
• QOS 0, 1 and 2 support
• SSL/TLS support
• Websockets support
• Clustering for high availability
• Pluggable authentication and authorization
• Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers
• Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads
• Plugin architecture to extend functionality
• High performance and low memory footprint

CrystalMQ Features

• Open source and free
• Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, STOMP
• High performance and low latency
• Horizontally scalable through sharding
• Persistence using Redis or PostgreSQL
• Supports clustering for high availability
• Plugin architecture for extendibility
• Admin dashboard and REST API for management

Pros & Cons Analysis

VerneMQ

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• High performance and scalability
• Built-in clustering for high availability
• Supports latest MQTT protocol versions
• Easy to deploy and configure
• Active community support

Cons

• Limited user management capabilities
• Not as feature rich as some commercial options
• Limited documentation and guides
• No graphical user interface
• Steep learning curve for some advanced features

CrystalMQ

Pros

• Lightweight and fast compared to many commercial MQ servers
• Very scalable for high throughput needs
• Supports many developer-friendly protocols out of the box
• Easy to deploy, manage, and monitor
• Open source with active community support

Cons

• Lacks some advanced features of commercial MQ servers
• Limited documentation and examples
• Not ideal for complex routing logic
• UI is basic compared to some alternatives

Pricing Comparison

VerneMQ

• Open Source

CrystalMQ

• Open Source