VerneMQ vs HiveMQ

Struggling to choose between VerneMQ and HiveMQ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

VerneMQ is a Network & Admin solution with tags like mqtt, broker, messaging, iot, erlang.

It boasts features such as Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support, QOS 0, 1 and 2 support, SSL/TLS support, Websockets support, Clustering for high availability, Pluggable authentication and authorization, Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers, Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads, Plugin architecture to extend functionality, High performance and low memory footprint and pros including Open source and free to use, High performance and scalability, Built-in clustering for high availability, Supports latest MQTT protocol versions, Easy to deploy and configure, Active community support.

On the other hand, HiveMQ is a Network & Admin product tagged with mqtt, messaging, iot, broker, open-source.

Its standout features include MQTT v3.1.1 and v5.0 compliant, Persistent sessions, Topic wildcards, SSL/TLS encryption, Access control lists, Clustering and high availability, Plugin system, REST API, Websockets, and it shines with pros like Open source, Scalable and performant, Enterprise-grade features, Well-documented, Active community support.

Feature	VerneMQ	HiveMQ
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

VerneMQ

Description: VerneMQ is an open-source, high-performance MQTT messaging broker written in Erlang. It is scalable, fault-tolerant and easy to set up. VerneMQ can handle thousands of MQTT clients on a single server instance.

HiveMQ

Description: HiveMQ is an open source MQTT messaging broker that enables connecting IoT devices to the cloud. It supports features like persistent sessions, security, scaling, and more. HiveMQ aims to provide enterprise-grade MQTT messaging infrastructure.

Key Features Comparison

VerneMQ Features

• Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support
• QOS 0, 1 and 2 support
• SSL/TLS support
• Websockets support
• Clustering for high availability
• Pluggable authentication and authorization
• Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers
• Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads
• Plugin architecture to extend functionality
• High performance and low memory footprint

HiveMQ Features

• MQTT v3.1.1 and v5.0 compliant
• Persistent sessions
• Topic wildcards
• SSL/TLS encryption
• Access control lists
• Clustering and high availability
• Plugin system
• REST API
• Websockets

Pros & Cons Analysis

VerneMQ

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• High performance and scalability
• Built-in clustering for high availability
• Supports latest MQTT protocol versions
• Easy to deploy and configure
• Active community support

Cons

• Limited user management capabilities
• Not as feature rich as some commercial options
• Limited documentation and guides
• No graphical user interface
• Steep learning curve for some advanced features

HiveMQ

Pros

• Open source
• Scalable and performant
• Enterprise-grade features
• Well-documented
• Active community support

Cons

• Limited user management capabilities
• No out-of-the-box analytics
• Steep learning curve for advanced features

Pricing Comparison

VerneMQ

• Open Source

HiveMQ

• Open Source
• Enterprise