CruiseControl.Net vs GoCD

Struggling to choose between CruiseControl.Net and GoCD? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CruiseControl.Net is a Development solution with tags like build, test, automation, integration, open-source.

It boasts features such as Automated build process, Integration with source control tools like SVN and Git, Customizable build triggers, Configurable notifications for build status, Web dashboard, Plugins for additional functionality, Works with various languages and frameworks like .NET, Java, Ruby, etc. and pros including Free and open source, Easy to set up and configure, Active community support, Highly customizable and extensible, Integrates well with CI/CD workflows, Web UI provides overview of build status.

On the other hand, GoCD is a Development product tagged with automation, continuous-delivery, continuous-integration, deployment, release-management.

Its standout features include Automated build pipeline creation and management, Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc, Parallel and sequential execution of tasks, Built-in artifact repository, Value stream map to visualize build workflow, Role based access control, Plugins for integration with other tools, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible via plugins, Good documentation and community support, Integrates well with other DevOps tools, Scales well for large codebases and teams.

Feature	CruiseControl.Net	GoCD
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CruiseControl.Net

Description: CruiseControl.Net is an open source continuous integration server for developers. It allows you to automatically build projects, run tests, and report on build status. CruiseControl.Net integrates with solutions like NAnt, Visual Studio, and SVN.

GoCD

Description: GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server that helps automate the software release workflow. It provides visibility into builds, deployments, and testing environments to help teams release software faster and more reliably.

Key Features Comparison

CruiseControl.Net Features

• Automated build process
• Integration with source control tools like SVN and Git
• Customizable build triggers
• Configurable notifications for build status
• Web dashboard
• Plugins for additional functionality
• Works with various languages and frameworks like .NET, Java, Ruby, etc.

GoCD Features

• Automated build pipeline creation and management
• Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc
• Parallel and sequential execution of tasks
• Built-in artifact repository
• Value stream map to visualize build workflow
• Role based access control
• Plugins for integration with other tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

CruiseControl.Net

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to set up and configure
• Active community support
• Highly customizable and extensible
• Integrates well with CI/CD workflows
• Web UI provides overview of build status

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Setup can be complex for larger projects
• Limited native support for some languages/platforms
• Web UI is basic and lacks some advanced features

GoCD

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Highly customizable and extensible via plugins
• Good documentation and community support
• Integrates well with other DevOps tools
• Scales well for large codebases and teams

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Setting up complex build pipelines can be tricky
• Lacks some advanced features found in paid alternatives
• Upgrades can be tricky due to breaking changes
• Limited native support for Windows environments

Pricing Comparison

CruiseControl.Net

• Open Source

GoCD

• Open Source