Earthly vs Semaphore

Struggling to choose between Earthly and Semaphore? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, Semaphore is a Development product tagged with cicd, testing, deployment, agile.

Its standout features include Continuous integration, Continuous delivery, Automated testing, Deployment automation, Project visibility and reporting, Parallel testing, Configurable pipelines, GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket integration, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and use, Great for agile teams, Fast and reliable pipelines, Good integration with popular code repositories, Parallel testing speeds up builds, Good visibility into builds and deployments, Flexible and customizable workflows.

Feature	Earthly	Semaphore
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Semaphore

Description: Semaphore is a continuous integration and delivery platform designed for agile teams. It provides fast and reliable CI/CD pipelines to build, test and deploy software applications.

Key Features Comparison

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Semaphore Features

• Continuous integration
• Continuous delivery
• Automated testing
• Deployment automation
• Project visibility and reporting
• Parallel testing
• Configurable pipelines
• GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket integration

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Semaphore

Pros

• Easy to set up and use
• Great for agile teams
• Fast and reliable pipelines
• Good integration with popular code repositories
• Parallel testing speeds up builds
• Good visibility into builds and deployments
• Flexible and customizable workflows

Cons

• Can get expensive for larger teams
• Limited free plan
• Not as feature rich as some competitors
• No on-premises version available
• Steep learning curve for advanced features

Pricing Comparison

Earthly

• Open Source

Semaphore

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based